Review Notes: I found the roll and draw to be way too loose and the flavor wasn't to my liking. I remember thinking of grass with every puff. Maybe I got a bad example, but I'm not willing to go back.

 Review Notes: I was pleasantly surprised with this after reading the reviews for this brand. It starts off a bit plain but quickly builds to a sweet ligero-like taste in a full-bodied smoke. The wrapper is a bit delicate and the construction could be better but other than that its great. Slightly overpriced IMO but I would certainly buy a 5-pack if the price were right. Lets end this Mexican standoff.

 Review Notes: I have to disagree with some of the other posts, as I found this stick quite good, after about 4 of them that have aged 6 to 18 months. wrapper,burn,draw all good; taste medium to med/full with a nice spice not usually associated with Nexican cigars. At less than $3, a good value

 Review Notes: This nicely pressed cigar has a somewhat crumpled wrapper and does feel very light for its size. Although it appears to be underfilled, it actually has a pretty good draw and doesn't smoke hot. The burn, while a bit unruly, stays lit and doesn't need relighting even after setting it down for several minutes. The ash is flaky. The first half of the smoke is lightly spicy and woody with a tart citrus taste that leads onto the finish; the second half tastes more like creamy coffee. Although it has some of the rustic qualities of a Te-Amo, I still think it's a decent medium-bodied smoke with some complexity; it's also a decent value as there's plenty of cigar here for 5 bucks. No. 24 in Cigar Aficionado's top 25 cigars of 2005.

 Review Notes: In know reviews are subjective, but I can't imagine this cigar making anyone's top 25 list. Not that it's bad, mind you; it's just — well, average at best. I can think of dozens of other cigars at this price point that would just blow it away. My stick was loosely packed, but still burned OK. Save your money and buy something you really like.