Review Notes: Read the reviews and I understand the difference in the names. They have some good cigars but his is not one. It is OK, Burn was OK, Draw was OK, Taste... not much. I got them cheap at auction. I got what I paid for. I Wouldn't even take any as a gift. No problem with burn or construction just not much on the taste side. I like Nicaraguan Cigars but these aren't CAO Brizilia or JDN Antanos, They look good but nothing show up. Sorry. And no matter how hard I tried the bands stuck which always pisses me off.

 Review Notes: previous review listed w/this cigar was of a different cigar by Arganese, the CL3 which is the only cigar I have tried by them that I did not like. Confusion is easy to have because they double-named their cigars before. Now the main lines seem to be CT wrapper (mild), Maduro (medium), and Nicauragan (full-bodied). I reviewed a Maduro corona before but the review did not say it was Maduro which is very key as it is the best maduro wrapper I have smoked yet. Favorite size in this wrapper is corona but Torpedo provides the rich creamy smoke and other flavors also. Note to top 25: please adjust how you list. Found this problem reading (yes, I realize it is not easy w/ so many cigars)

 Review Notes: This needs a different spot maybe (I am new this). Last Spring because I enjoyed a free sample from Arganese so much, I jumped and bought 3 boxes of their 3 diffent lines and body-strength. Boy, am I glad this was not available to buy then! Why manufacturers decide to disregard decades of blending non-ligero w/ ligero for a proper burn etc. and just load a cigar w/ ligero, I don't know. This was hard to light and really was disappointing from a company that has pleased me so much w/ their main lines.