Review Notes: Maybe I made a mistake buying this cigar at a casino at 3 in the morning for 100 percent markup, but I was in the mood. The cigar burnt well, but the flavor was so harsh and burnt. I don't know how long it was sitting there but the humidity might have been off.

 Review Notes: I tried to like this cigar, but didn't. Once upon a time I bought a box of these. The presentation is fantastic and construction seems top-notch (other than a bit of a loose draw). Unfortuanately, the flavor when first purchased was green, grassy and bitter. So, I left them alone for 12-years in my storage humidor. I just pulled one out and tried it again after all that time. The aging certainly changed this cigar for the better, but not enough. Only hints of the greeness remain, but there is still a bitter aspect there. They also burn hot, which does not help with any depth of flavors coming through that might redeem this little guy. I can't say I'd recommend these, even after extensive aging. To be fair, though, the ones I'm smoking were produced back in '96 or '97. Perhaps current production is better, or perhaps I just some rolled with a bad batch of tobacco from a time when prime materials were at a premium and hard to find.

 Review Notes: Can't go wrong with fuente, and i love the spice and good burn on this short smoke.

 Review Notes: This was a very nice cigar for what it is - a mild smoke. The flavors were dry but quite pleasant, including light wood and nuts. I never found it to be grassy. On the occasion when I'm looking for a mild cigar, this will definitely be a consideration.

 Review Notes: I am mixed on this cigar. I enjoy the taste. Woody, slightly nutty for the first half. Tward the end it turns a bit grassy. I have liked these in the past, but the burn was not very good. I could barely hold onto an ash, and it was very dark grey in color. Also had some bad tunneling on this one. If this was improved it would be a good average cigar.