Review Notes: Smoked one from a tube. Excellent construction and draw. Overall profile is slightly stronger than macs but with a more developed tastes of wood and cream.Beginners can't go wrong

Review Notes: I smoke AVO XO, Ashton VSG, Davidoff 2000, but this cigar work extermely well with my palate. Perfect roll, coffe, walnut taste, nto over powering .

Review Notes: Mild to moderate cigar that had a good draw, lots of smoke and good even flavor

Review Notes: this was a non-spectacular cigar but not bad, its construction and burn were very good and the flavor and aroma were both good, just nothing great i still prefer the maduro the best in the AVO line

Review Notes: I’m at a loss to describe this cigar, I can only tell you what it wasn’t. It wasn’t, spicy, or flavorful, and it didn’t have much body. It wasn’t bitter, sour, biting, or acrid. It wasn’t good, but it wasn’t bad either. I don’t recommend it because it didn’t stand out in any way. I’ve smoked better cigars for less money, and worse cigars that cost a lot more. In my opinion, a good cigar should give you a reason to smoke it, this one did not. The only good note is that it drew and burned perfectly, I hate a cigar that I have to futz around with, and this one was perfectly rolled. Bad construction can ruin a good cigar, but unfortunately good construction can not save a mediocre cigar. Perhaps it’s unfair, but it’s true.