Review Date:09/28/2005 Review By:madturk Review Title:zzzzzz This Reviews Rating:5
Criteria
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience
Review Notes:nothing special.average cigar.
Review Date:04/24/2005 Review By:OPCigarMan Review Title:Fabuloso! This Reviews Rating:8
Criteria
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience
Review Notes:I have always loved this Cigar. It has had the tendency to be a bit inconsistent, as reflected by the various reviews, but overall, it is a good, solid smoke with lots of flavor. Aging really helps this stick alot and you'll find it has a creamy and nutty flavor, as does the Casa Grande, also by Bauza. This brand is not carried by many Tobacconists and unfortunately it is a bit overpriced as a result. If you can find it under $4 buy it while you can.
Review Date:05/13/2004 Review By:ASHMAN Review Title:Not4me This Reviews Rating:5.17
Criteria
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience
Review Notes:I've heard others in this line are good (pyramid) but not this one. Shallow flavor profile and poor Dominican taste. Goes to show even a famous manufacturer can't overcome mediocre tobacco.
Review Date:01/28/2004 Review By:Dice Review Title:Bland This Reviews Rating:6
Criteria
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience
Review Notes:What else can I say? I have a box, smoke about five. never came around. I don't think these will age well. I think I got a bad year/box. Will report again in the future as I have about 15 left. little/no flavor. Other than that not bad
Review Date:08/30/1999 Review By:rbc Review Title: This Reviews Rating:6.8
Criteria
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience
Review Notes:Wrapper was a bit veiny. Flavor was a bit vegetal. Not a top choice.
