|
|
Consuegra #16 Governor (Maduro) Cigar Reviews
Below are the cigar reviews for the Consuegra #16 Governor (Maduro). If you would like to add your own
personal cigar review for the Consuegra #16 Governor (Maduro) please click here.
|
Cigar Vitals |
Consuegra Cigars
#16 Governor (Maduro)
|
Current Rating
6.63 |
|
|
Size: |
|
6 1/8 x 50 |
|
Shape: |
|
Grand Corona |
|
Wrapper: |
|
Honduras |
|
Filler: |
|
D.R., Hon, Nic |
|
Binder: |
|
Honduras |
|
MSRP: |
|
$1.35 |
|
| Total Reviews: |
5 |
|
| Average Rating: |
6.63 out of a possible 10 |
|
| Average Price: |
$1.12 |
|
| Discontinued: |
No |
|
| Notes: |
|
| Quick Rating |
| This cigar SMOKES! This cigar is a DUD! |
|
| Vote Now! |
|
(0) |
|
(0) |
|
"Barely worth the money. No flavor or nicotine"
| Review by: |
JRED |
| Review Date: |
03/26/2006 |
| Rating: |
3.5 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
Following previous reviews I thought I would try these, so I bought a bundle.
Expected construction and appearance for a second. Some looked good, some looked odd, lots of veins, etc.
I have smoke three of these after aging for 1 month. Each started with decent smoke but no flavor. Still the same at the half point. At the finish the flavor was about what I would have expected in the first half.
To sum it up: No Flavor, No Taste, No Nicotine. Some people like this, so try a couple singles first or buy a bundle and give them out to people that dont smoke... you can afford it.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Great cheap smoke!"
| Review by: |
Sticks |
| Review Date: |
08/27/2005 |
| Rating: |
7.5 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
I was a little leary at first because they looked like a Belinda Black which really suck. I found the draw to be decent and the taste a little minty and very good. I plan on aging these about six months and they should be a very quality smoke.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Getting better/update"
| Review by: |
keno |
| Review Date: |
07/29/2005 |
| Rating: |
8.83 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
ive smoke another 5 of so of these babies and they are tasting alot better 2 weeks or so after my 1st post, the flavor is richer and deeper,these cigars have now been aging about 2 months in one of my humidor
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Grassy/almond"
| Review by: |
keno |
| Review Date: |
07/12/2005 |
| Rating: |
5.67 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
ive smoked about 5 out of a bundle of 25
and they are all pretty consistant,which for connies is unusual, that's the good news the bads news is that they arent what i'd call premium quality taste,they start out a bit grassy and end with an un-complex almond taste, great draw and nice creamy smoke, but just average taste,however I paid around $1 for them and I'm getting a fair return on my investment
shame they dont taste better cause the construction is A + solid and oily, maybe a bit less than the factory orginals, my wrappers have at least one thick vein running thru them but that doesnt trouble me, I'm sure these are Punch Pita's that need some extented aging, of course Punch Pita's will run ya a bit than a buck, so if you buy them as i did, dont complain
enjoy them for what they are a cheap smoke better than allot of mix filler seconds (these are all long filler)and are better than a bunch of closeout and off brand cigars
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Hint of molasses and rich down to the nub."
| Review by: |
markus |
| Review Date: |
07/30/2004 |
| Rating: |
7.67 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
Great tasting dark cigar. Down to the nub every time. A hint of molasses. Great low priced stogey.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
| Quick Rating |
| This cigar SMOKES! This cigar is a DUD! |
|
| Vote Now! |
|
(0) |
|
(0) |
|
Add A Review Of This Cigar
Just fill out the form below to create a rating and review of
this cigar. Once you submit your review you cannot change it.
Please check your spelling and information before clicking the "Submit Your Review" button.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puff.com Daily Digest
Thank you for your interest in the Puff.com Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on Puff.com in our free Daily Digest.
To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.