|
|
Davidoff Anniversario No. 2 Cigar Reviews
Below are the cigar reviews for the Davidoff Anniversario No. 2. If you would like to add your own
personal cigar review for the Davidoff Anniversario No. 2 please click here.
|
Cigar Vitals |
Davidoff Cigars
Anniversario No. 2
|
Current Rating
8.03 |
|
|
Size: |
|
7 x 48 |
|
Shape: |
|
Churchill |
|
Wrapper: |
|
USA/Conn Shade |
|
Filler: |
|
Dom. Rep. |
|
Binder: |
|
Dom. Rep. |
|
MSRP: |
|
$0.00 |
|
| Total Reviews: |
15 |
|
| Average Rating: |
8.03 out of a possible 10 |
|
| Average Price: |
$12.05 |
|
| Discontinued: |
No |
|
| Notes: |
|
| Quick Rating |
| This cigar SMOKES! This cigar is a DUD! |
|
| Vote Now! |
|
(0) |
|
(0) |
|
"First davidoff"
| Review by: |
jeff patel |
| Review Date: |
10/19/2008 |
| Rating: |
8.33 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
went to a davidoff mystery tour nite at the hartford cigar shop. The anniversary number 2 was the mystery cigar. had a great burn and nice white ash very pleased with flavor not to complex.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Hmmm"
| Review by: |
3Vandoo |
| Review Date: |
01/15/2007 |
| Rating: |
4.33 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
This is my first review on this site, and this Davidoff will have the privilege to be the first.
I wasn't very impressed with this cigar at all. We expected much more and we were thinking about the line of the worst Davidoff in the 80's.
My business partner had a few boxes at his home and he sent a few down my way to stock in my humidors. We smoked a few and we werent very impressed by them, always saying to ourselve, maybe later, nothing compared to our Robaina, Cohiba or Trinidad.
To start off, this is probably one of the ugliest cigar I've seen in a long time. The wrapper is plain ugly, just say it loud "fugly!"
The cigar is pretty light in structure and very smooth at the touch. Not a strong built at all.
The construction seems a so so, while my partner the wrapper went away, mine stayed there with no hesitation.
The flavor of the cigar at first was pretty harst, I even remember saying to myself "what in hell the president of Davidoff is saying talking about milder cigars in the industry". It was spicy, very harsh tobaco flavours. Then at the half of the cigar, it mellowed down quite hard. It went from harst to smooth, pretty smooth with some nutty, piney and leathery flavours.
Not bad, but I've had better
PS: The smoke coming from that cigar caused my wife to be sick! Which never happened before.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Smooth, consistent, creamy"
| Review by: |
Stable1 |
| Review Date: |
12/13/2006 |
| Rating: |
7.83 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
Construction of this cigar was of high quality. A mild smoke with a light woodsy creamy flavor. A short finish makes this great for entertaining a varied group just being exposed to cigars. Good burn qualities, consistent ash. A little pricey.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Tasty davidoff"
| Review by: |
Taz |
| Review Date: |
04/02/2006 |
| Rating: |
8.5 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
I lit one of these up a week ago. Wonderful construction, mild davidoff prelight aroma. Strong coffee and cocoa emanated from this, but it did burn a bit more quickly than I would have liked. It was not as multi-dimensional as the anniversary #3 tubo. Not as good bang for the buck, but a solid smoke.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"I'm glad it was free"
| Review by: |
LawDawg |
| Review Date: |
12/17/2005 |
| Rating: |
6.67 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
Got one of these for free at a Davidoff event and was sorely disappointed. I'd tried a few things from the Avo and Griffin's lines, and actually prefered some of the smokes within the later makes. Save your money and buy a Griffin's 2000 - the mild flavor is almost identical.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
| Quick Rating |
| This cigar SMOKES! This cigar is a DUD! |
|
| Vote Now! |
|
(0) |
|
(0) |
|
Add A Review Of This Cigar
Just fill out the form below to create a rating and review of
this cigar. Once you submit your review you cannot change it.
Please check your spelling and information before clicking the "Submit Your Review" button.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puff.com Daily Digest
Thank you for your interest in the Puff.com Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on Puff.com in our free Daily Digest.
To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.