Review Notes: Well, the first 3 siglo I smoked was an anniversary edition. I'm not sure what the difference is but there is one. First, this cigar had a darker, oily wrapper compared to the lighter shade on the anniversary. Generally, I like a darker wrapper, but in this case I have to say the anniversary was better. This cigar had a more pronounced cedar flavor. For me, this was too much. It also had some nuttiness and spice, but mostly cedar. It looked really nice and had a great burn and draw; so I can't knock it for that. However, almost all I tasted was cedar. If this is your thing then pick up a fiver on cbid, if not then pass over this one.

Review Notes: For the price I wasn't expecting much. But I ended up ordering more. The Construction and burn were good. The flavor had a nice nuttiness with some cedar and mellow sweetness. I found this to be a nice change of pace to the full bodied maddies I usually smoke.

Review Notes: I'm running out of adjectives to describe all the great cigars I'm smoking, and this was real tough. This cigar really just made me realize how much I love full bodied smokes. Such a smooth, crisp flavor. Draw and burn are on point. My only complaint would be the aroma of the smoke is not so pleasing, actually stung my nostrils a bit.

Review Notes: A Siglos? Maybe that means pretty darn good cigar. Anyway, I was surprised at how tasty this cigar was. It had just the right dose of salt, nuts and sweetness, it really was delicious. It's really not much to look at the veins and creases are obvious and the white band gives it some character, though very conservative. The burn was excellent, as was the draw. The price is terrific so I will be ordering more.

Review Notes: this cigar not only looks great, but tastes just as good. nice strong cigar, best after a heavy meal. the 5x52 size is preferred, lasts about 1.5hrs with great burn and doesnt look like your holding a hot dog. definitely a top-tier smoke worthy of its high rankings.