|
|
Gurkha X-Fuerte Torpedo Cigar Reviews
Below are the cigar reviews for the Gurkha X-Fuerte Torpedo. If you would like to add your own
personal cigar review for the Gurkha X-Fuerte Torpedo please click here.
|
Cigar Vitals |
Gurkha X-Fuerte Cigars
Torpedo
|
Current Rating
5.89 |
|
|
Size: |
|
7 x 54 |
|
Shape: |
|
Torpedo |
|
Wrapper: |
|
Costa Rica |
|
Filler: |
|
Hond., Nic. |
|
Binder: |
|
Nicaragua |
|
MSRP: |
|
$11.00 |
|
| Total Reviews: |
11 |
|
| Average Rating: |
5.89 out of a possible 10 |
|
| Average Price: |
$5.88 |
|
| Discontinued: |
No |
|
| Notes: |
|
| Quick Rating |
| This cigar SMOKES! This cigar is a DUD! |
|
| Vote Now! |
|
(0) |
|
(0) |
|
"BITTER"
| Review by: |
sbrbanmale |
| Review Date: |
07/02/2009 |
| Rating: |
5.6 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
The Gurkha brand has way too many blends out there to keep track of, and maintain any quality. This one is just plain harsh. Stick with the older Regent and Legend lines.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Guess I got the good one"
| Review by: |
usm1811 |
| Review Date: |
05/27/2009 |
| Rating: |
7 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
I bought 5 of these a few months back and tried my first last week. It's probably a good thing I didn't check the reviews or I wouldn't have picked them up. So far so good, I've only tried one and it was very nice. No splitting, nice flavor, not to harsh, tons of smoke, and most importantly, my wife enjoyed the aroma. I hope my remaining four will smoke as well as the first.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Nahhh"
| Review by: |
CigarSlut |
| Review Date: |
01/27/2008 |
| Rating: |
3.67 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
I can hardly keep up with all the friggin blends Hansotia is kicking out lately but I put them in two camps damn good or WTF? This was a WTF. I ordered 2 singles (pricey-bad idea) from CI out of curiosity. They were not bad in the flavor department but on the milder side of medium. There some good flavors in there at times but thin smoke and the most delicate wrapper I have seen in years. I was afraid these were going to split open and at times the foot would burn so that the ash split out to the side; weird. I hate to bang a Gurkha but they really need to get their shit together regarding consistency and in this case marketing...Fuerte? My butt. I will keep burning through the Black Puro's like my life depends on it but they can keep this one.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(1) |
|
"Don't waste your money"
| Review by: |
Jeff Potts |
| Review Date: |
10/25/2007 |
| Rating: |
4.67 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
People either love these or hate 'em.
I've had two of these, and that's all I need. Don't bother with them, they're a waste of money. They're not strong, they were weak in the flavor department, everyone complains about them spitting, and the construction on the two I had was generally terrible - one had a vein poking up through the wrapper. These are REALLY oily cigars, so you'd better dry-box them for a day or so before you smoke them, or ages them for a year and let them "even out".
The ash holds pretty firm to the end, the burn is bad (oily cigar effect), and they have a tendancy to go out. There are *some* notes of coffee and chocolate, but by and large I found them to be basically lacking in flavor.
These are expensive sticks. For the most part, they are crap. The only reason why you'd want to buy these is to impress someone.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(1) |
|
"Not bad if it doesn't split"
| Review by: |
n811 |
| Review Date: |
06/21/2007 |
| Rating: |
7.5 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
I think I'm one of the lucky few who has a bundle of these that doesn't split. Overall, these are way more mild that the billing suggests. The last stick I had developed a few varying flavors through the burn and was quite tasty. I think these burn too quickly for their size, but it's a rare occasion that I look for a cigar that actually smokes 2 1/2 hours anyway. This last one smoked 90 minutes.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
| Quick Rating |
| This cigar SMOKES! This cigar is a DUD! |
|
| Vote Now! |
|
(0) |
|
(0) |
|
Add A Review Of This Cigar
Just fill out the form below to create a rating and review of
this cigar. Once you submit your review you cannot change it.
Please check your spelling and information before clicking the "Submit Your Review" button.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puff.com Daily Digest
Thank you for your interest in the Puff.com Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on Puff.com in our free Daily Digest.
To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.