Review Notes: I have smoked several of them now and the experience has been consistent. The look of them is great in the sense that the wrapper is the color of dark milk chocolate, cuban maduro but not very dark. It is still oily even though it is a little wrinkled with one vein in a few samples. Construction is solid, no soft spots to speak of, beautiful cap. After an easy cut, pre-light draw is very good. After lighting, the draw is excellent, cool with clouds of smoke, burn is very straight, the dark grey ash is fairly tight. It starts out quite mild towards a grand finale which is, instead, strong. Flavors include wet earth, cocoa, H. Upmann toast, some leather, some spice, and great tobacco evolving to become very intense in the grand finale. Wow!

Review Notes: I GOT ONE AS A GIVEN BY SOMEONE. I HAVE THE SAME FELLINGS AS MOST. A MILDER THAN USUAL CIGAR NO KICK OR TWISTS. VERY ONE DIMENSIONAL. IF A PAID FOR THE RIDE I WOULD HAVE ASKED FOR MY BUS PASS BACK. MAKE A LA GLORIA LOOK COMPLEX.

Review Notes: got a box in 2005, smoked 10, aging the rest. All look very appealing, some were ecellent others not as good due to construction default. the draw was tight and unevent burn,too bad for an E L. but the good ones, delivered exellent aroma, flavor and burn.

Review Notes: I always like the construction of Hupman. This one was solid. The flavor was just too mild though. If they could combine this construction with a LGC flavor...ooo la la that would be grand.

Review Notes: Extremely surprised at the mildness - the mildest cigar I've ever smoked. Looked great and burned great, but I was expected more flavor (and more body). After smoking the Magnum 46, expected a lot, and was somewhat disappointed.