|
|
Indian Tabac 10th Ann. Robusto Cigar Reviews
Below are the cigar reviews for the Indian Tabac 10th Ann. Robusto. If you would like to add your own
personal cigar review for the Indian Tabac 10th Ann. Robusto please click here.
|
Cigar Vitals |
Indian Tabac 10th Ann. Cigars
Robusto
|
Current Rating
7.75 |
|
|
Size: |
|
5 x 50 |
|
Shape: |
|
Robusto |
|
Wrapper: |
|
Nicaragua |
|
Filler: |
|
Nicaragua |
|
Binder: |
|
Nicaragua |
|
MSRP: |
|
$6.25 |
|
| Total Reviews: |
7 |
|
| Average Rating: |
7.75 out of a possible 10 |
|
| Average Price: |
$4.84 |
|
| Discontinued: |
No |
|
| Notes: |
|
| Quick Rating |
| This cigar SMOKES! This cigar is a DUD! |
|
| Vote Now! |
|
(0) |
|
(0) |
|
"Decent cigar"
| Review by: |
cigar noob |
| Review Date: |
07/29/2011 |
| Rating: |
7.4 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
This cigar is decent. It isn't overly exceptional or overly bad. It had a nice flavor, burned well, had a nice draw, and appears to be priced right. It isn't a cigar that makes you run out and immediately buy more though. It's a solid stick and I would smoke another if someone offered it up.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Nice Flavor"
| Review by: |
smokehole |
| Review Date: |
09/15/2009 |
| Rating: |
7.4 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
I really liked the flavor of this cigar, which is hard to describe. Too bad the construction was average at best. It was tasty through the end and I did nub it. The draw was a bit too loose and the darn thing kept tunneling on me. An attractive cigar that's a fine value, did I mention I liked the taste?
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Great burn, average taste"
| Review by: |
trendo |
| Review Date: |
09/01/2009 |
| Rating: |
7.6 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
Upon first inspection, the cigar seemed decent. There is one large vein running the legnth of the cigar, and a small patch by the head.
First third:After the first ten minutes he ash is a beautifull white. There is however a valley down the middle of the ash which I suspect will be a problem later.
Second third: The ash held on and is still a nice white. Burn is slightly uneven, but still good. Flavors remained consistent, but I am afraid my palate is blown out from a (unsuccessfull) attempt at picking up pipe smoking this morning.
Final third: burn remained good, but the cigar took a bitter, sour note. Because of this, I am calling it quits. This cigar was good, but not great. Nothing about it was bad, I just dont think I would buy a whole box. The burn was good, and the ash was nice. For me, a good burn is worth some points because it adds to the overall experience.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Better than I expected"
| Review by: |
XLNC |
| Review Date: |
02/26/2008 |
| Rating: |
7.83 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
This was my first Indian Tabac cigar. I got it as part of the 8-pack sampler, with four of these and four Rocky Patel Decade Robustos. They've been sitting for about 6 weeks now. I saw a bad review of this cigar at StogieReview.com, so I was not expecting much. Boy was I pleasently surprised. The cigar looks very nice, slight sheen and no prominent veins. The draw was a bit tough, but not at all enough to affect the enjoyment of the cigar. Strength a little full for my taste, but stayed smooth and never harsh. I couldn't put my finger on the flavor notes (never been good at that) but I liked what I tasted. What really amazed me more than anything is how perfect the burn was, and how slow the thing smoked. The ash just refused to fall off. The smoke is gray, but quite thick. I figured it would be a 45 min smoke, but lasted 1 hr 45 mins. Now I regret giving away two of these to friends. I have one left, and will let it sit a couple of months and review again. Great smoke for the $5 I paid for it, hoping to find more for cheaper.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Alright, time would help"
| Review by: |
tar heel |
| Review Date: |
12/28/2007 |
| Rating: |
6.33 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
Like the other two reviewers I primarily tasted pepper, but it wasn't too strong. This was a pretty consistently tasting cigar, since the beginning tasted just like the last third. I never noticed any flavor change, just a decrease in intensity from a solid medium to a more subdued medium spiciness. I wasn't bowled over by the stick, and could easily have found something similar that was a little better for the same price, but over all it was not bad, just alright. I smoked this the day I bought it, so age may improve it. The draw was very good and the smoke was surprisingly thick, but there were some burn issues that were corrected with only a single touch-up.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
| Quick Rating |
| This cigar SMOKES! This cigar is a DUD! |
|
| Vote Now! |
|
(0) |
|
(0) |
|
Add A Review Of This Cigar
Just fill out the form below to create a rating and review of
this cigar. Once you submit your review you cannot change it.
Please check your spelling and information before clicking the "Submit Your Review" button.
|
|
|
|
|
|