Review Notes: For me this one can't be classified as a robusto as it is longer with a larger ring gauge than ordinary robustos. Anyhow I liked this cigar but I just wish I'd smoked it when I had more time to spare to full enjoy the cigar. I found it to be too much on the light side for a Montecristo. It was sweet and I found flavours that reminded me of cantilope. I like fat cigar so for me the edmundo is a beauty.

Review Notes: I just got some edmundos, and they are simply beautiful. The wrappers look perfect, and the construction is, as a whole, excellent. I've tried one. Pre-light draw was great. Fired it up, and was met with a wonderful, smooth havana flavor. The ones I got (May 05) are not real strong, but they are very pleasant. Overall, reminded me of a Trinidad Robusto Extra. The burn was excellent as well. I'm letting the remainder rest, but I will buy more.

Review Notes: A good flavored smoke, sometimes sweet and sometimes more earthy, but doesn't compare to the #2 or #4, or ELs for complexity or body. Good draw and burn, and don't get me wrong, better than most smokes out there, but for the money I'd take a #2 over this one.

Review Notes: I'm guessing that many of these other reviews were bogus because they didn't really smoke the real deal. They must have gotten ripped, this is one of the best Cubans to come out in years. I loved it. Perfect construction, tons of smoke, and medium bodied. A future legend.

Review Notes: Purchased a box of these in April 2003, before they were widely known or available. I found the cigars to be a bit young and could have used more aging. The burn rate was even and they did have a nice flavor. The second box was a bit better, perhaps aged a bit more