MEMBER CIGAR REVIEWS | STAFF CIGAR REVIEWS | CIGAR VIDEOS | ONE ON ONE INTERVIEWS | CIGAR NEWS | CIGAR FORUMS | PIPES | LIFESTYLE | CONTACT
 
Nat Sherman Metro Metropolitan Cigar Reviews
Below are the cigar reviews for the Nat Sherman Metro Metropolitan. If you would like to add your own personal cigar review for the Nat Sherman Metro Metropolitan please click here.


Cigar Vitals


Nat Sherman Metro Cigars
  Metropolitan       

Current Rating
6.91

Size: 7 x 50
Shape: Double Corona
Wrapper: USA/Conn.
Filler: Dom. Rep.
Binder: Dom. Rep.
MSRP: 0.00
Total Reviews: 2
Average Rating: 6.91 out of a possible 10
Average Price: 5.62
Discontinued: No
Notes:

Quick Rating
This cigar SMOKES! This cigar is a DUD!
Vote Now! This cigar SMOKES! (0) This cigar is a DUD. (0)


"Among the finest!"

Review by: BillyCigars
Review Date: 12/25/2007
Rating: 9.33
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience

Review Notes: I used to live in NYC and every 2 weeks or so, a friend and I would visit several of the Tobacconists in the City as part of our "Cigar Crawl" -- Nat Sherman's being one of our favorites. These smokes are extremely consistent in their flavor profile, construction, and room note. Every single time I smoke one, it puts me right back into the old Nat Sherman walk-in humidor lounge. These are amazing smokes -- especially for the price!

Does this reviewer know this cigar? Yes (5) No (1)

"Bland"

Review by: MisterSurgery
Review Date: 06/26/2007
Rating: 4.5
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience

Review Notes: First off, the Metropolitan is not a 7" x60 pyramid, it is a 7" x 50 double corona. The above description is incorrect. Now that we have that out of the way, on to the review. Okay appearance and mild pre-light aroma. Construction was pretty off. Although the evenness of the burn was fair, the draw was extremely tight allowing for small amounts of smoke. The flavor itself was mild, as would be expected, but it was a very bland flavor. It had small elements of sweetness, almost pear-like, but overall, it was a ver boring cigar that I just did not enjoy. I find the Host line to be more flavorful, and easier on the wallet, for that matter.

Does this reviewer know this cigar? Yes (6) No (4)


Quick Rating
This cigar SMOKES! This cigar is a DUD!
Vote Now! This cigar SMOKES! (0) This cigar is a DUD. (0)



Add A Review Of This Cigar
Just fill out the form below to create a rating and review of this cigar. Once you submit your review you cannot change it.
Please check your spelling and information before clicking the "Submit Your Review" button.


Reviewer Name


WARNING - YOU ARE NOT LOGGED IN!

If you wish for this review to be credited to your account name and viewable in the 'Reviews by user' report, then you must have an account with Puff.com and be logged in while submitting the review. To create an account, Click Here. To LOG IN, use the login form on the right.


Review Title
(A couple word summary of your review...)
Review Comments
Price Paid $ (Approx. price paid per cigar.)
Appearance  (1 to 10)
Construction  (1 to 10)          10 = Perfect Smoke
Flavor  (1 to 10)          5 = About Average
Value  (1 to 10)          1 = Not Worth It
Overall Smoking Experience  (1 to 10)
Spam Protection
   Image Text:

      



   


Sign Up to our
GET IT NOW!






 

Member Cigar Reviews | Staff Cigar Reviews | Cigar Videos | One on One Interviews | Cigar News | Puffcast | Cigar Forums | Lifestyle | Partners | Contact
© 2015 by Caputo Media, LLC. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Ad Blockers Suck! Why?


Puff.com Daily Digest

Thank you for your interest in the Puff.com Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on Puff.com in our free Daily Digest. To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.


Email Address:


Email will come from "donotreply@caputomedia.com". Please whitelist this email address.

Cancel and Return to page