|
|
Nestor Reserve 2000 Torpedo Cigar Reviews
Below are the cigar reviews for the Nestor Reserve 2000 Torpedo. If you would like to add your own
personal cigar review for the Nestor Reserve 2000 Torpedo please click here.
|
Cigar Vitals |
Nestor Reserve 2000 Cigars
Torpedo
|
Current Rating
6.75 |
|
|
Size: |
|
7 x 50 |
|
Shape: |
|
Torpedo |
|
Wrapper: |
|
Nicaragua |
|
Filler: |
|
Hon., Mex., Nic. |
|
Binder: |
|
Nicaragua |
|
MSRP: |
|
$0.00 |
|
| Total Reviews: |
27 |
|
| Average Rating: |
6.75 out of a possible 10 |
|
| Average Price: |
$2.07 |
|
| Discontinued: |
No |
|
| Notes: |
|
| Quick Rating |
| This cigar SMOKES! This cigar is a DUD! |
|
| Vote Now! |
|
(0) |
|
(0) |
|
"An ok value"
| Review by: |
ncohafmuta |
| Review Date: |
11/27/2006 |
| Rating: |
5.5 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
personally, i didn't care for this cigar, but not to say others wouldn't like it.
it was heavy on black licorice throughout, and i hate black licorice, but that's me.
dark wrapper, nice burn, too loose a draw though.
some coffee and chocolate.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Nice aging stock!"
| Review by: |
palm55 |
| Review Date: |
08/14/2006 |
| Rating: |
8 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
I smoked a couple of "greenies" from my first bundle a few months ago, and was impressed with the coffee-mocha flavor, though unimpressed with the burn.
Fast-forward three months... The flavor had mellowed, and the burn improved somewhat. Any draw issues wer easily corrected with a draw tool. For the price, I'm darned happy with this stick! Enough so that I popped for another bundle for wintertime aging stock. If they keep making 'em, I'll keep buying 'em!
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"I like em"
| Review by: |
RedBeard |
| Review Date: |
06/25/2006 |
| Rating: |
7.5 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
Just got one of the old leftover batches of the original blend and there great. Its got a thick hard black maduro wrapper the screams eat me. It pack and solid all the way down and had a perfect draw. The constuction on these is near perfect and the burn and draw are excellent. It's a very chocolate flavor with a taste of nuts. It's a pertty darn good smoke, and considering the price it's well worth it.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Just remember it's a $2 cigar."
| Review by: |
Scotty |
| Review Date: |
06/14/2006 |
| Rating: |
6.67 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
Nine more months of aging has produced (in nearly half of what's left) ugly, cracked wrappers and lumpy, swelled filler. This stick was barely smokeable last night. The wrapper and filler were downright nasty looking. Very uneven burn and a tight draw. What kept this from "becoming additional lawn mulch" was the very nice flavors of coffee, mocha, and wood, with an occasional spice blast. Instead of being mostly mild this stick flashed to medium bodied at times. Sometimes a tad harsh, but, for two bucks, I feel I got my monies worth as it took 2 hours to smoke this to the nub. From what I can tell so far, Mark is right on by mentioning smoking these within the window of their (second and) sixth month of aging. NOTE: This stick scores well in the most important categories.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Gets worse with age"
| Review by: |
Mark |
| Review Date: |
02/26/2006 |
| Rating: |
7.17 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
I used to smoke a lot of these from the bundle I ordered but layed off them for around 6 months. Now, it seems like the flavor it used to have has mellowed out so much that it doesn't do it for me anymore. Also, the burn is uneven on these things, probably because of the box press. I would reccomend this cigar, especially at their price, but I would smoke most of them within the first 6 months. I still have around 7 left; maybe they will be a bit better.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
| Quick Rating |
| This cigar SMOKES! This cigar is a DUD! |
|
| Vote Now! |
|
(0) |
|
(0) |
|
Add A Review Of This Cigar
Just fill out the form below to create a rating and review of
this cigar. Once you submit your review you cannot change it.
Please check your spelling and information before clicking the "Submit Your Review" button.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puff.com Daily Digest
Thank you for your interest in the Puff.com Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on Puff.com in our free Daily Digest.
To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.