MEMBER CIGAR REVIEWS | STAFF CIGAR REVIEWS | CIGAR VIDEOS | ONE ON ONE INTERVIEWS | CIGAR NEWS | CIGAR FORUMS | PIPES | LIFESTYLE | CONTACT
 
Padilla Serie 1968 Toro Cigar Reviews
Below are the cigar reviews for the Padilla Serie 1968 Toro. If you would like to add your own personal cigar review for the Padilla Serie 1968 Toro please click here.


Cigar Vitals


Padilla Serie 1968 Cigars
  Toro       

Current Rating
6.98

Size: 6 x 50
Shape: Toro
Wrapper: Nicaragua
Filler: Nicaragua
Binder: Nicaragua
MSRP: 7.00
Total Reviews: 7
Average Rating: 6.98 out of a possible 10
Average Price: 4.33
Discontinued: No
Notes:

Quick Rating
50% of voters like the Padilla Serie 1968 - Toro
Vote Now! This cigar SMOKES! (1) This cigar is a DUD. (1)

Page 1 of 2 :: NEXT PAGE

"On the mild side"

Review by: Jack
Review Date: 10/27/2009
Rating: 6.8
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience

Review Notes: This is the right cigar for somebody... just not for me. The series 1968 does not pack the same punch as some other Padilla lines such as the Miami, Signature 1932 and Habano (all of which I love). Still, contrction is good and there was nothing "wrong" with the 1968, except that it likely requires someone with a taste for milder cigars to fully enjoy it... or maybe someone with a more refined palate than mine. Gimme' both barrels when it comes to flavor and body. This one is a pea-shooter compared to the 20-gauge umph of some of Padilla's other offerings. The flavors did intesify somewhat in the final 1/3 of this '68. Primarily straight tobacco taste with a bit of chocolate in the undertone, but not one whit of spiciness.

Does this reviewer know this cigar? Yes (1) No (1)

"Poorly made cigars"

Review by: Airheadmotorcycle
Review Date: 09/22/2009
Rating: 4.4
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience

Review Notes: Lots of problems with a Padilla sampler I bought. Construction is very poor. The prior reviewer takes me to task based on my experience. I was just commenting on how we all have different experiences, and isn't it strange how I can love one cigar and others don't appreciate it. Here I pointed out that others seem to love this cigar and I found it unsatisfactory. I didn't mean to criticize others' opinion like wongster did to me. Biased? Of course. That's what reviews are. They are subjective experiences. I'm certainly not negatively biased against Padilla cigars. I dislike some (Obsidian for instance), but 1932 for instance is one of my very favorite cigars. When the cherry falls off the end of a burning cigar due to a weak ash, what is wrong with commenting on that? I didn't think we were supposed to address others' reviews on this site anyway, just give our own opinion. Before this I always sought out wongster's reviews due to our similar taste in cigars. I'm a little surprised the moderators allowed his comment, actually. I've been reviewing pipe tobacco and cigars for over 10 years, and I've never had anyone do this before. This will be my last contribution to this resource.

Does this reviewer know this cigar? Yes (7) No (10)

"Great smoke"

Review by: the wongster
Review Date: 05/31/2009
Rating: 7.2
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience

Review Notes: I agree with Redbeard toasty airy pull light pepper and woody. well rolled nice B & W zebra ash. previous review sounded very biased. everyone has their own perspective. so if someone gives a cigar you love a bad rating "DEAL WITH IT". Love the wongster.

Does this reviewer know this cigar? Yes (0) No (1)

"There must be some mistake"

Review by: Airheadmotorcycle
Review Date: 05/20/2009
Rating: 4.4
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience

Review Notes: I can't believe I'm reviewing the same cigar as the previous 3 reviewers. I don't know how many of my favorite cigars are rated poorly by folks on here. Then I smoke possibly the worst cigar I've ever smoked and I see it's rated 8.68 before my entry. The cigar seemed under-filled. It was light and not firm at all. About a 1/2 " in the cherry fell completely out/off of the foot, leaving an unlit cigar in my hand! The ash was surely the flakiest I've ever encountered. Flakier than any Cuban sandwich cigar. It would fall off immediately. About half way through, I could see a tunnel when I looked down the cigar from the foot! It was just empty space where a leaf should be. Despite all that it did taste pretty good and burn quite evenly. The wrapper was toothy, yet pretty. This toro was part of a Padilla '68 sampler that included 4 sizes of 5 cigars for $50. The Churchill has been the best, but they're under-filled too. The torpedo was almost this bad. Maybe the sampler is built of seconds or rejects. If so, that's a poor way to market a premium cigar. Even at $2.50 these are not a good value.

Does this reviewer know this cigar? Yes (9) No (4)

"Very very good"

Review by: docruger
Review Date: 04/13/2009
Rating: 9.2
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience

Review Notes: I find this cigar to be very among the best with a little cocoa,hint of pepper and spice.and best part is no strong leather like many so called high dollar sticks. so ENJOY

Does this reviewer know this cigar? Yes (0) No (1)


Page 1 of 2 :: NEXT PAGE
Go To Page: [ 1 ][ 2 ]

Quick Rating
50% of voters like the Padilla Serie 1968 - Toro
Vote Now! This cigar SMOKES! (1) This cigar is a DUD. (1)



Add A Review Of This Cigar
Just fill out the form below to create a rating and review of this cigar. Once you submit your review you cannot change it.
Please check your spelling and information before clicking the "Submit Your Review" button.


Reviewer Name


WARNING - YOU ARE NOT LOGGED IN!

If you wish for this review to be credited to your account name and viewable in the 'Reviews by user' report, then you must have an account with Puff.com and be logged in while submitting the review. To create an account, Click Here. To LOG IN, use the login form on the right.


Review Title
(A couple word summary of your review...)
Review Comments
Price Paid $ (Approx. price paid per cigar.)
Appearance  (1 to 10)
Construction  (1 to 10)          10 = Perfect Smoke
Flavor  (1 to 10)          5 = About Average
Value  (1 to 10)          1 = Not Worth It
Overall Smoking Experience  (1 to 10)
Spam Protection
   Image Text:

      



   

Latest Cigar Video

Sign Up to our
GET IT NOW!






 

Member Cigar Reviews | Staff Cigar Reviews | Cigar Videos | One on One Interviews | Cigar News | Puffcast | Cigar Forums | Lifestyle | Partners | Contact
© 2015 by Caputo Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Cluster hosted by Hostway.
Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Ad Blockers Suck! Why?


Puff.com Daily Digest

Thank you for your interest in the Puff.com Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on Puff.com in our free Daily Digest. To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.


Email Address:


Email will come from "donotreply@caputomedia.com". Please whitelist this email address.

Cancel and Return to page