MEMBER CIGAR REVIEWS | STAFF CIGAR REVIEWS | CIGAR VIDEOS | ONE ON ONE INTERVIEWS | CIGAR NEWS | CIGAR FORUMS | PIPES | LIFESTYLE | CONTACT
 
Padron Serie 1926 No. 35 Cigar Reviews
Below are the cigar reviews for the Padron Serie 1926 No. 35. If you would like to add your own personal cigar review for the Padron Serie 1926 No. 35 please click here.


Cigar Vitals


Padron Serie 1926 Cigars
  No. 35       

Current Rating
8.52

Size: 4 x 47
Shape: Robusto
Wrapper: Nicaragua
Filler: Nicaragua
Binder: Nicaragua
MSRP: 0.00
Total Reviews: 23
Average Rating: 8.52 out of a possible 10
Average Price: 10.23
Discontinued: No
Notes:

Quick Rating
100% of voters like the Padron Serie 1926 - No. 35
Vote Now! This cigar SMOKES! (10) This cigar is a DUD. (0)

Page 3 of 5 :: PREVIOUS PAGE | NEXT PAGE

"My current favorite"

Review by: Box Press
Review Date: 12/08/2006
Rating: 9.67
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience

Review Notes: Excellent smoke, burns magnificently. You can actually see the wrapper, binder, and filler all burning separately, but in perfect harmony. I find this to be more medium than full. If you have less than an hour you can't find a better cigar.

Does this reviewer know this cigar? Yes (6) No (6)

"Small, but great!"

Review by: yourchoice
Review Date: 11/29/2006
Rating: 9.33
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience

Review Notes: First time smoking anything from the 1926 line. Perfectly constructed little guy that I thought would be a quick smoke with some punch. Prelight draw was a little loose and I was a little worried it was too loose. Wrong! Burned Perfectly. I could have lit it, and tossed my lighter, this thing never wavered. From the start, this thing impressed me. Tons of flavor, and tons (and I mean TONS) of smoke. I complemented this with Glen Moray 12 yr. and boy did it hit the spot. The cigar was full flavor and full strength, but NEVER harsh. I tasted some chocolate or cocoa flavors, and some obvious lip tingling pepper background. Total smoke time was around 40-45 minutes (nubbed that sucker!) Overall By far, the best NC I've ever had. The overall strength of it was impressive, but not overbearing.

Does this reviewer know this cigar? Yes (5) No (4)

"Sokay"

Review by: Dreadlock
Review Date: 10/02/2006
Rating: 5.5
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience

Review Notes: Nice little stick, even if overpriced. The flavor was the highlight here, the rest was average.

Does this reviewer know this cigar? Yes (12) No (13)

"Good"

Review by: J
Review Date: 09/10/2006
Rating: 8.83
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience

Review Notes: I've tried the 1964 and the 1926 is definitely a better cigar...not that the 1964 is bad, but it really didn't have all that much in the way of flavor. This one is spicier and has more bite to it, it's like a 1964 but stronger. Wrapper is stronger also. Moderate buzz factor here...this is not a mild cigar. Tastes like a little bit of everything, earthy amd leathery, but mainly coffee beans (signature Padron taste), unfortunately I'm not a big fan of that taste, being more in the woody tasting sort of camp. Burn and construction are top-notch. For $10 it better be though....however flavor faded quickly 1/2 way down. In fact in my 10+ years of cigar smoking I don't think I've ever smoked one past halfway...call me Winston Churchill, that's what he used to do. But the fact that I don't really like the Padron taste too much, combined with the steep price, I probably won't buy any more of these any time soon. It's a good cigar, but there's better out there for less, at least to me. I can think of maybe 3 or 4 cigars that are "better", but that's my opinion. But if you like the Padron taste, you'll love this cigar. Otherwise it's just too much money to pay.

Does this reviewer know this cigar? Yes (6) No (6)

"Damn"

Review by: cecil
Review Date: 08/01/2006
Rating: 9.67
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience

Review Notes: one word fantastic!!!!!

Does this reviewer know this cigar? Yes (1) No (4)


Page 3 of 5 :: PREVIOUS PAGE | NEXT PAGE
Go To Page: [ 1 ][ 2 ][ 3 ][ 4 ][ 5 ]

Quick Rating
100% of voters like the Padron Serie 1926 - No. 35
Vote Now! This cigar SMOKES! (10) This cigar is a DUD. (0)



Add A Review Of This Cigar
Just fill out the form below to create a rating and review of this cigar. Once you submit your review you cannot change it.
Please check your spelling and information before clicking the "Submit Your Review" button.


Reviewer Name


WARNING - YOU ARE NOT LOGGED IN!

If you wish for this review to be credited to your account name and viewable in the 'Reviews by user' report, then you must have an account with Puff.com and be logged in while submitting the review. To create an account, Click Here. To LOG IN, use the login form on the right.


Review Title
(A couple word summary of your review...)
Review Comments
Price Paid $ (Approx. price paid per cigar.)
Appearance  (1 to 10)
Construction  (1 to 10)          10 = Perfect Smoke
Flavor  (1 to 10)          5 = About Average
Value  (1 to 10)          1 = Not Worth It
Overall Smoking Experience  (1 to 10)
Spam Protection
   Image Text:

      



   


Sign Up to our
GET IT NOW!






 

Member Cigar Reviews | Staff Cigar Reviews | Cigar Videos | One on One Interviews | Cigar News | Puffcast | Cigar Forums | Lifestyle | Partners | Contact
© 2015 by Caputo Media, LLC. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Ad Blockers Suck! Why?


Puff.com Daily Digest

Thank you for your interest in the Puff.com Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on Puff.com in our free Daily Digest. To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.


Email Address:


Email will come from "donotreply@caputomedia.com". Please whitelist this email address.

Cancel and Return to page