Review Notes: I live a very hectic lifestyle and dont have much time for a big smoke.So I seem to be partial to medium to smaller smokes,and I have to say that this is the most perfect smoke I have ever had the pleasure of trying.Great draw,Super taste,a total shame to put down.It has changed my mind about rushing a good cigar.Next time Im at the smoke shop I am going to try a full size"as long as its the serie 1926

 Review Notes: This aged beauty is known to all serious cigar smokers. Mention the #35, AFH short story or a LGC figurado and I think you would get some similar raving reviews for each one. This smoke has and will always delight the serious cigar smoker.

 Review Notes: Without a doubt one of the very best cigars I have ever smoked. Tastes very well aged to me, not old and musty... but then, some cigars I don't care for are the cat's pajamas to others. Each to his own. This stick is as good as any Cuban or other cigar in the world for my money. Just bought a box and it's on the way. Bought these because they don't have my fav 1926, the #6.

 Review Notes: ...And not in a good way. I've had several of Padron's Anniversary offerings, both the in the '64 and the '26, and for the life of me, I cannot figure out why people like these so much. They're just not that good. They're never nasty, but the taste is always stale and musty. There are notes of chocolate, coffee, and all the other things people go on and on about, but the dominating flavor characteristic is always "old-ness." Not "well-aged," just old. I've said it before and I'll say it again, I'd happily trade two Padron 1926's or 1964's for just one of their regular line cigars. PS – this one was a gift. I’m through paying good money for these when there are so many better choices out there.

 Review Notes: Ditto on JJMD's April 23, 2006 write up. I could not have describe it any better. Lots of white smoke. Worth every penny, I mean dollar.