Below are the cigar reviews for the Padron 6000 (M). If you would like to add your own
personal cigar review for the Padron 6000 (M) please click here.
Cigar Vitals
Padron Cigars
6000 (M)
Current Rating 7.45
Size:5 1/2 x 52
Shape:Torpedo
Wrapper:Nicaragua
Filler:Nicaragua
Binder:Nicaragua
MSRP: $0.00
Total Reviews:31 Average User Rating:7.45 out of a possible 10 Average Price Paid:
$6.53 Discontinued?
No Notes:
Review Date:05/07/2007 Review By:fsu troy Review Title:best value ever This Reviews Rating:8.83
Criteria
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience
Review Notes:what a smoke for sooo little.please do me and you a favor , try one now. perhaps the best value out there now.
Review Date:05/03/2007 Review By:JackH Review Title:Torpedo's sometimes miss. This Reviews Rating:6.67
Criteria
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience
Review Notes:I assumed this style is considered superior but my experience is that the Robusto wins hands down. Not enough going for this one to warrant a return engagement.
Review Date:10/11/2006 Review By:BuzzCkr Review Title:Consistently GOOD This Reviews Rating:9.33
Criteria
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience
Review Notes:After trying Padrons for the past two years, the 6000 Maduro delivers with consistency. This cigars has one of the better draws of any, it starts with a strong coffee/dark chocolate flavor with a touch of spice, then it mellows through the middle, and the last third hits you with the Padron signature light buzz. I've had most cigars out there for twice as much, this is my favorite cigar for the money.
Review Date:08/09/2006 Review By:Travis Review Title:OK This Reviews Rating:6.83
Criteria
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience
Review Notes:This smoke was not what I thought it would be, especially after ageing it for a year and a half. I really like Padron’s, and Nicaraguan smokes in general, but this one did not have any of the fully, spicy flavors I was hoping for. I was pretty dull with some clover and alfalfa flavors. Overall, I didn't like it very much, but I'm not really sure what to think. It's possible that it just didn't age well, but I won't know until I try a younger one.
Review Date:07/31/2006 Review By:BigNogga Review Title:Almost Forgot This Reviews Rating:8.5
Criteria
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience
Review Notes:I went away from this cigar for about 6 months after finishing a box, but I picked up another box just before I finished the first one & decided to let them chill for a little. Obviously 6 months later I picked one out of the humidor, & once again I'm back on em again. I've spoken to other enthusiast of this cigar about aging these, and the return will be much like a 1964. I must say, they aren't, but they get a similar characteristic that I love about the 64's. The one I just smoked, had that silkiness that the natural 64's have, but with more of a charred coffee flavor. The aging has definetly mellowed out the spiceness that is typical of Padron's thousand line, & created a smoother smoke & with no bitterness toward the end. All in all the aging has created a more consistent smoke that is enjoyable like a 64, but without the extra complexity that a 64 has to offer. Plain and simple, Padron has great tobacco, which in turn provides consistent taste, & you always know what you get. Take care of your cigars, and they will be good to you. Much like Padron does for me and other fans out there of Padron.