|
|
Padron 6000 (M) Cigar Reviews
Below are the cigar reviews for the Padron 6000 (M). If you would like to add your own
personal cigar review for the Padron 6000 (M) please click here.
|
Cigar Vitals |
Padron Cigars
6000 (M)
|
Current Rating
7.48 |
|
|
Size: |
|
5 1/2 x 52 |
|
Shape: |
|
Torpedo |
|
Wrapper: |
|
Nicaragua |
|
Filler: |
|
Nicaragua |
|
Binder: |
|
Nicaragua |
|
MSRP: |
|
$0.00 |
|
| Total Reviews: |
35 |
|
| Average Rating: |
7.48 out of a possible 10 |
|
| Average Price: |
$6.71 |
|
| Discontinued: |
No |
|
| Notes: |
|
| Quick Rating |
| 100% of voters like the Padron - 6000 (M) |
|
| Vote Now! |
|
(2) |
|
(0) |
|
"Torpedo's sometimes miss."
| Review by: |
JackH |
| Review Date: |
05/03/2007 |
| Rating: |
6.67 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
I assumed this style is considered superior but my experience is that the Robusto wins hands down. Not enough going for this one to warrant a return engagement.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Consistently GOOD"
| Review by: |
BuzzCkr |
| Review Date: |
10/11/2006 |
| Rating: |
9.33 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
After trying Padrons for the past two years, the 6000 Maduro delivers with consistency. This cigars has one of the better draws of any, it starts with a strong coffee/dark chocolate flavor with a touch of spice, then it mellows through the middle, and the last third hits you with the Padron signature light buzz. I've had most cigars out there for twice as much, this is my favorite cigar for the money.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"OK"
| Review by: |
Travis |
| Review Date: |
08/09/2006 |
| Rating: |
6.83 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
This smoke was not what I thought it would be, especially after ageing it for a year and a half. I really like Padron’s, and Nicaraguan smokes in general, but this one did not have any of the fully, spicy flavors I was hoping for. I was pretty dull with some clover and alfalfa flavors. Overall, I didn't like it very much, but I'm not really sure what to think. It's possible that it just didn't age well, but I won't know until I try a younger one.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Almost Forgot"
| Review by: |
BigNogga |
| Review Date: |
07/31/2006 |
| Rating: |
8.5 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
I went away from this cigar for about 6 months after finishing a box, but I picked up another box just before I finished the first one & decided to let them chill for a little. Obviously 6 months later I picked one out of the humidor, & once again I'm back on em again. I've spoken to other enthusiast of this cigar about aging these, and the return will be much like a 1964. I must say, they aren't, but they get a similar characteristic that I love about the 64's. The one I just smoked, had that silkiness that the natural 64's have, but with more of a charred coffee flavor. The aging has definetly mellowed out the spiceness that is typical of Padron's thousand line, & created a smoother smoke & with no bitterness toward the end. All in all the aging has created a more consistent smoke that is enjoyable like a 64, but without the extra complexity that a 64 has to offer. Plain and simple, Padron has great tobacco, which in turn provides consistent taste, & you always know what you get. Take care of your cigars, and they will be good to you. Much like Padron does for me and other fans out there of Padron.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Not bad, not great either"
| Review by: |
Ryan Z. |
| Review Date: |
07/29/2006 |
| Rating: |
5.67 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
The anticipation for this cigar was more than what this cigar provided. No real flavors here. Had a Ashton and Partagas Black after this cigar. Definitely, the worst of the three.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
| Quick Rating |
| 100% of voters like the Padron - 6000 (M) |
|
| Vote Now! |
|
(2) |
|
(0) |
|
Add A Review Of This Cigar
Just fill out the form below to create a rating and review of
this cigar. Once you submit your review you cannot change it.
Please check your spelling and information before clicking the "Submit Your Review" button.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puff.com Daily Digest
Thank you for your interest in the Puff.com Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on Puff.com in our free Daily Digest.
To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.