MEMBER CIGAR REVIEWS | STAFF CIGAR REVIEWS | CIGAR VIDEOS | ONE ON ONE INTERVIEWS | CIGAR NEWS | CIGAR FORUMS | PIPES | LIFESTYLE | CONTACT
 
Padron 6000 (M) Cigar Reviews
Below are the cigar reviews for the Padron 6000 (M). If you would like to add your own personal cigar review for the Padron 6000 (M) please click here.


Cigar Vitals


Padron Cigars
  6000 (M)       

Current Rating
7.48

Size: 5 1/2 x 52
Shape: Torpedo
Wrapper: Nicaragua
Filler: Nicaragua
Binder: Nicaragua
MSRP: 0.00
Total Reviews: 35
Average Rating: 7.48 out of a possible 10
Average Price: 6.71
Discontinued: No
Notes:

Quick Rating
55.6% of voters like the Padron - 6000 (M)
Vote Now! This cigar SMOKES! (10) This cigar is a DUD. (8)

Page 4 of 7 :: PREVIOUS PAGE | NEXT PAGE

"Torpedo's sometimes miss."

Review by: JackH
Review Date: 05/03/2007
Rating: 6.67
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience

Review Notes: I assumed this style is considered superior but my experience is that the Robusto wins hands down. Not enough going for this one to warrant a return engagement.

Does this reviewer know this cigar? Yes (0) No (0)

"Consistently GOOD"

Review by: BuzzCkr
Review Date: 10/11/2006
Rating: 9.33
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience

Review Notes: After trying Padrons for the past two years, the 6000 Maduro delivers with consistency. This cigars has one of the better draws of any, it starts with a strong coffee/dark chocolate flavor with a touch of spice, then it mellows through the middle, and the last third hits you with the Padron signature light buzz. I've had most cigars out there for twice as much, this is my favorite cigar for the money.

Does this reviewer know this cigar? Yes (0) No (0)

"OK"

Review by: Travis
Review Date: 08/09/2006
Rating: 6.83
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience

Review Notes: This smoke was not what I thought it would be, especially after ageing it for a year and a half. I really like Padronís, and Nicaraguan smokes in general, but this one did not have any of the fully, spicy flavors I was hoping for. I was pretty dull with some clover and alfalfa flavors. Overall, I didn't like it very much, but I'm not really sure what to think. It's possible that it just didn't age well, but I won't know until I try a younger one.

Does this reviewer know this cigar? Yes (0) No (0)

"Almost Forgot"

Review by: BigNogga
Review Date: 07/31/2006
Rating: 8.5
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience

Review Notes: I went away from this cigar for about 6 months after finishing a box, but I picked up another box just before I finished the first one & decided to let them chill for a little. Obviously 6 months later I picked one out of the humidor, & once again I'm back on em again. I've spoken to other enthusiast of this cigar about aging these, and the return will be much like a 1964. I must say, they aren't, but they get a similar characteristic that I love about the 64's. The one I just smoked, had that silkiness that the natural 64's have, but with more of a charred coffee flavor. The aging has definetly mellowed out the spiceness that is typical of Padron's thousand line, & created a smoother smoke & with no bitterness toward the end. All in all the aging has created a more consistent smoke that is enjoyable like a 64, but without the extra complexity that a 64 has to offer. Plain and simple, Padron has great tobacco, which in turn provides consistent taste, & you always know what you get. Take care of your cigars, and they will be good to you. Much like Padron does for me and other fans out there of Padron.

Does this reviewer know this cigar? Yes (8) No (3)

"Not bad, not great either"

Review by: Ryan Z.
Review Date: 07/29/2006
Rating: 5.67
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience

Review Notes: The anticipation for this cigar was more than what this cigar provided. No real flavors here. Had a Ashton and Partagas Black after this cigar. Definitely, the worst of the three.

Does this reviewer know this cigar? Yes (1) No (0)


Page 4 of 7 :: PREVIOUS PAGE | NEXT PAGE
Go To Page: [ 1 ][ 2 ][ 3 ][ 4 ][ 5 ][ 6 ][ 7 ]

Quick Rating
55.6% of voters like the Padron - 6000 (M)
Vote Now! This cigar SMOKES! (10) This cigar is a DUD. (8)



Add A Review Of This Cigar
Just fill out the form below to create a rating and review of this cigar. Once you submit your review you cannot change it.
Please check your spelling and information before clicking the "Submit Your Review" button.


Reviewer Name


WARNING - YOU ARE NOT LOGGED IN!

If you wish for this review to be credited to your account name and viewable in the 'Reviews by user' report, then you must have an account with Puff.com and be logged in while submitting the review. To create an account, Click Here. To LOG IN, use the login form on the right.


Review Title
(A couple word summary of your review...)
Review Comments
Price Paid $ (Approx. price paid per cigar.)
Appearance  (1 to 10)
Construction  (1 to 10)          10 = Perfect Smoke
Flavor  (1 to 10)          5 = About Average
Value  (1 to 10)          1 = Not Worth It
Overall Smoking Experience  (1 to 10)
Spam Protection
   Image Text:

      



   


Sign Up to our
GET IT NOW!





Puff RSS  Puff RSS
Forums RSS  Forums RSS
Site Map  Site Map


View us on Facebook and Twitter Find us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter



 

Member Cigar Reviews | Staff Cigar Reviews | Cigar Videos | One on One Interviews | Cigar News | Puffcast | Cigar Forums | Lifestyle | Partners | Contact
© 2015 by Caputo Media, LLC. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Ad Blockers Suck! Why?


Puff.com Daily Digest

Thank you for your interest in the Puff.com Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on Puff.com in our free Daily Digest. To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.


Email Address:


Email will come from "donotreply@caputomedia.com". Please whitelist this email address.

Cancel and Return to page