Review Notes: I feel like Forest Gump. You never know what you'll get... with the Londres. The first one I smoked, I thought man this is a great gar! I liked the box-pressed feel in my mouth and it was tasty. Well then came three stinkers, and yes they are the same cigar. Finally, the last two I smoked were good and great respectively. You just don't know. So I'll try and rate it, but I won't buy any more.

Review Notes: I just happenned to stumble upon the Padron when a man at the local cigar store recommended it to me. I had been searching for a while to try to find a good, well-made, even-burning maduro, that had a good smooth flavor to match. The Padron is definately it. I was surprised at it's richness. It's flavor has slight hints of spice and chocolate, but it's not enough to make you sick. It's appearance is a little rough but I believe that it adds to this cigars uniqueness. This is a perfect blend of construction, flavor, and value!

Review Notes: Very well constructed with an even burn to match. I would strongly recomend this cigar as a social smoke. It's aroma is very pleasing with a little depth to it's flavor but very unique for a maduro. This is a must have in any humidor!

Review Notes: Beautifully constructed. Great draw and burn. Very handsome. It was a bit harsh fr the first half inch. Then it mellowed out and was completely unremarkable in every way until about 2/3 the way through. Then, some nice flavor kicked in for about three puffs and it went sour. I put this one down decently before the band. Having adored a 1964 just a few nights ago, maybe I was expecting too much from a $5 smoke, but it's flavor just did not match it's terrific looks. In this price bracket, I've had far better from LGC.

Review Notes: So I ordered a 16 oz of their French Roast, added some sugar. Real nice coffee. Somewhat strong but nice and smooth. Some pre-light ideas about my Padron. The last Padron I had smoked (was also my first) was a 3000 Maduro. I had heard rave reviews on this smoke but I was dissapointed. This Londres was sort of rough looking construction wise. Veiny and had some bruises on the wrapper. I was afraid that I had gotten a dud given its looks. I punched it and took a prelight draw. Wow, totally different taste than the Maddie 3000. Sweet hay type flavour. I really liked it and was hoping that my smoking experience would be similar.Well...I was not dissapointed. This smoke had a nice sweet taste to it. I would say it was mild/medium. Very smooth, with nice, creamy white smoke. The draw was nice and easy. Not tight at all, yet not too loose. There was a good amount of smoke with each draw. The sweet flavour lasted through the first half. Nice and consistent flavour through the first half. At the half-way point the flavour became a bit charry, but a few purges and a half inch later it became sweet again. The last two inches the smoke became a bit hot, but some spice kicked in. Good flavour still. The hot smoke is to be expected with such a small rg cigar.The thing burnt very straight despite my construction worries. Very good burn. Very good value and highly recommended.