Review Notes: started out great with a nice rich taste of chocolate then 1/2 way it started getting dry and bitter. Not as good as many other perdomo i have smoked

 Review Notes: These are a beautiful cigar. I bought two, to share with a friend during a special golf game. They smelled wonderful, drew very well and they burned nice and straight but there was very little flavor and what flavor there was, was not pleasant. It had a metallic tinge to it, very sharp and bitter. It got worse an inch into the cigar. I smoked about half of it, maybe, and tossed it into the hazard. My pal, who normally "nubs" his cigars, tossed his, too. No way this thing was worth $8, sorry. If you want a smooth, flavorful mild cigar, try a Fonseca or a Gispert or even a St. Louis Rey, all are much more pleasant smoking experiences than this one. If you want a nice, medium to full bodied smoke, go with the Padrons and Rocky Patels. But this one, I'm sorry, is overhyped.

 Review Notes: A well constructed, enjoyable cigar. Even burn and good draw were the highlights. One wrapper blemish.

 Review Notes: I concur with Professor Dave, the first reviewer of this smoke. A good mild smoke. Nice change of pace for a smoker who prefers full bodied cigar.

 Review Notes: Uncanny how my taste experience with this cigar, resembles some of the past reviews. A nice looking natural wrapper with a few minor blemishes. Stayed lit and burned very straight. An excellent draw for a Toro sized cigar, not too tight or too loose. A slight pepper taste during the first inch of the cigar. Changes to a mild smoke with woodsy notes. Taste is a little disappointing, not much to keep an experienced cigar smoker interested. Dense clouds of smoke from this cigar. A quality constructed very mild smoke that is too pricey. If you like mild cigars, pick up these when a deal is offered.