|
|
Pryme LE Gold 200X Cigar Reviews
Below are the cigar reviews for the Pryme LE Gold 200X. If you would like to add your own
personal cigar review for the Pryme LE Gold 200X please click here.
|
Cigar Vitals |
Pryme LE Gold Cigars
200X
|
Current Rating
7.07 |
|
|
Size: |
|
6 1/8 x 50 |
|
Shape: |
|
Toro |
|
Wrapper: |
|
Ecuador |
|
Filler: |
|
D.R., Mex, Hon, Nic |
|
Binder: |
|
Mexico |
|
MSRP: |
|
$9.25 |
|
| Total Reviews: |
7 |
|
| Average Rating: |
7.07 out of a possible 10 |
|
| Average Price: |
$3.72 |
|
| Discontinued: |
No |
|
| Notes: |
|
| Quick Rating |
| This cigar SMOKES! This cigar is a DUD! |
|
| Vote Now! |
|
(0) |
|
(0) |
|
"Good and bad things with this cigar:"
| Review by: |
Jeff Potts |
| Review Date: |
11/27/2007 |
| Rating: |
7.33 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
First the negatives:
1) The wrapper was extremely fragile. I just about shattered it trying to get the cedar wrapper off the cigar.
2) The band is awfully nice looking, but a real p*sser to remove. Once again, I roughed-up an already damaged wrapper trying to ger the damn thing off (and yes, I tried to let the heat from my fingers loosen the glue...after about 30 minutes, it had no effect).
3) Slightly tight draw, I had to cut up further on the cap to fix this. This I attribute to the general humidity of the season.
Now the positives:
1) Tastes almost exactly like a Perdomo Campange, RP Conneticut Vintage, and the like. Some call it a "honey" flavor, others "salty". None the less, it was creamy.
2) Despite having a wrapper that was in virtual shreds by the last 1/3 of the stick, it burned well, and performed well. It wasn't much at producing smoke on the first few puffs, but then it got much better.
3) Stayed lit for a fairly long period of time inbetween puffs.
4) This sucker burned long and slow.
5) When comared to competing smokes with the same general profile, these are a better value.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Paradox"
| Review by: |
FC |
| Review Date: |
11/13/2007 |
| Rating: |
8 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
I can see why this cigar wasn't a hit at MSRP. I picked up some on cbid at $4 per and for that price it's a home run. It is one dimensional but that doesn't bother me for the money. Great stick if you want a cigar that tastes good and won't blow you away. Cedar and tobacco with no noticable other flavors.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Pretty good"
| Review by: |
dabru |
| Review Date: |
10/22/2007 |
| Rating: |
7.33 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
A received a couple of these in a sample pack and found them to be very good and unlike the other reviewers I found the flavor to be excellent even though it was mild. I would compare them to Graycliff Chateau or CAO black in terms of flavor and body. As for price- well I suppose that's what the value score is for.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Mild mild mild"
| Review by: |
y0c |
| Review Date: |
03/19/2007 |
| Rating: |
5.67 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
Like everyone said, i found this to be very boring and mild. The draw, like the 100r, was very nice and, as far as i can tell, perfect. it was a bit harsher and dirtier than the 100r from what i can remember, but was still very lacking in flavor. construction and look was very good
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"These have not aged well."
| Review by: |
Scotty |
| Review Date: |
02/12/2007 |
| Rating: |
6.67 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
Sometimes aging just doesn't do a damn thing. This is what I am beginning to think with these cigars. I've had nirvanah flavor experiences within this series with the torpedo shape but this size disappoints me now. It looks, smells, and feels like it would be a middleweight contender but has flyweight taste and depth of body. They smoke well but are just too mild and boring for me now. I think you are going to start seeing these everywhere in sampler packs soon. Mexican filler and binder....what was I thinking?
Worth a shot in the torpedo size at about 3-4/stick. Only buy this size if you can nab them for $2-3 a throw and you like mild cigars.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
| Quick Rating |
| This cigar SMOKES! This cigar is a DUD! |
|
| Vote Now! |
|
(0) |
|
(0) |
|
Add A Review Of This Cigar
Just fill out the form below to create a rating and review of
this cigar. Once you submit your review you cannot change it.
Please check your spelling and information before clicking the "Submit Your Review" button.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puff.com Daily Digest
Thank you for your interest in the Puff.com Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on Puff.com in our free Daily Digest.
To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.