Review Notes: I love a good maduro and this is a great maduro. The wrapper is perfect with flawless const., burned razor sharp. Cocao is present the entire length with leather floating in and out and some cedar thrown in the mix. I smoke fast, and this cigar burned for an hour and a half. Picked up a ten pack for 37.50 so this was an absolute steal.I don't think I'd pay full price for a box, these are expensive cigars, but my are they good.

Review Notes: I'm relatively new to cigar smoking and when my guy at the cigar shop near where I live turned me on to these I was impressed by how it looked! The dark wrapper and the box press were very easy on the eyes. Now this cigar isn't all about looks. This was a medium body smoke that even for a novice like me wasn't difficult to enjoy. Notes of coco leather and little bit of cherry made this a very enjoyable cigar. And I highly recommend it!

Review Notes: as the last guy said,this cigar is pure cocoa.i must be honest and say that as i live in the UK all i smoke are normally Cuban.if this is what you guys in the states have to put up with,i feel sorry for you.the cigar had the sickly sweet cocoa taste throughout,no development of flavours whatsoever.mine was bought for me by a dear friend in Latvia.it came in a glass tube and looked impressive.

Review Notes: Great...Cocoa, smooth, M/F body but smooth. Great draw. Oily. Just about everything I want in a cigar. Too small for a church. CigarBid is the only place I buy these so they have to be put in the humi for a time so I have found with most CI gars.

Review Notes: The first thing I notice when approach this stick, is the aroma of the wrapper: it has a really nice floral scent, slight rose-like. ok, not like a frickin' Glade aor freshener, just the slightest undertone that accompanies the cedar, leather and cinnamon tones. Well constructed, I've never had a bad one, and I've smoked two full boxes (so far) of the 1990, my favorite over the 1992 by far. Draw is always good, the burn usually perfect, sometimes an odd-ball one-sider, but who cares? My only gripe is that it's not really a Churchill, now is it? It's almost a Lancero, and certainly equivalent to a Lonsdale.