Review Notes: Don't think I ever smoked a bad Romeo in my life - until now. Mike's had a special, 60 bucks for a box. Who can pass that up? Well, these must've been in the bargain bin for a reason. Construct, burn, ash were all perfect but the flavor was off. I let them sit for awhile in my 'dor, but they still have this bitter nastiness to them. I suspect weather alone can produce huge variations in flavor let alone a thousand other variables affecting the whole process.

Review Notes: This cigar was a decent smoke. Had a really good draw, but a slightly uneven burn. The earth and leather flavors were well balanced with hints of wood and nuts. The wrapper was veiny, possibly causing the uneven burn.

Review Notes: Smoked one with 1 year good down time. Still not the best cigar but better than when young. A long slightly bitter finish follows nice cedar and toast flavors. Early the cigar is quite spicy but that fades. Construction is excellent but I chucked cigar at 3+ inches left, so not a great value.

Review Notes: Not the greatest cigar in the world...It was constructed well but didn't have a lot of taste. I did smoke it with a Monte #2 and the Bully was better. Probably will not buy another.

Review Notes: Honestly this cigar surprised me. I expected to HATE it after smoking a Churchill but I actually enjoyed it. It wasn't great nor was it terrible. Its a fairly straightforward mild cigar which isn't my favorite but my girl really likes them. The construction is good with a reasonably even burn. To make a long story short, I no longer cringe at the thought of a RJ 1875 because of the Bully! That said this isn't the kind of cigar that I look forward to for the entire week. Its more of a sure, got a few minutes, wouldn't mind a cigar smoke.