|
|
Sancho Panza (Hon) Valiente Cigar Reviews
Below are the cigar reviews for the Sancho Panza (Hon) Valiente. If you would like to add your own
personal cigar review for the Sancho Panza (Hon) Valiente please click here.
|
Cigar Vitals |
Sancho Panza (Hon) Cigars
Valiente
|
Current Rating
7.18 |
|
|
Size: |
|
5 1/4 x 50 |
|
Shape: |
|
Robusto |
|
Wrapper: |
|
USA/Conn. |
|
Filler: |
|
D.R., Hon, Nic |
|
Binder: |
|
USA/Conn. |
|
MSRP: |
|
$0.00 |
|
| Total Reviews: |
33 |
|
| Average Rating: |
7.18 out of a possible 10 |
|
| Average Price: |
$2.98 |
|
| Discontinued: |
No |
|
| Notes: |
|
| Quick Rating |
| This cigar SMOKES! This cigar is a DUD! |
|
| Vote Now! |
|
(0) |
|
(0) |
|
"Aging brings out the best"
| Review by: |
Merlyn |
| Review Date: |
11/20/2006 |
| Rating: |
8.33 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
After over a year of aging, this cigar was mild to medium in body, with a very nice mix of creamy and toasty flavors. The second half had some really nice charry overtones, and was consistently smooth with a good burn.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Good mild smoke"
| Review by: |
Dima |
| Review Date: |
11/19/2006 |
| Rating: |
8.67 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
I was impressed by this cigar. Started out with mild taste, then got a bit spicier, then mellowed out again. Burn was a bit too fast (or maybe I was puffing too much), but all-n-all, I enjoyed this one a lot.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Alright"
| Review by: |
tylernim |
| Review Date: |
04/05/2006 |
| Rating: |
6.17 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
this reminded me alot of the padron 2000 natural. the build was ok, same with the burn. just a bit uneven. lit fairly easily. the draw was too loose for my taste. speaking of taste, this one didn't really do it for me. i couldn't even really pick out anything disticnt. the price is cheap of course which slightly makes up for it. probably will not buy again.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Needs to Stay Lost in La Mancha"
| Review by: |
Mac |
| Review Date: |
03/14/2006 |
| Rating: |
3.83 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
Disgusting smoke. My wife is usually pretty accepting of my cigar hobby, but she told me I had to take this one outside and I don't blame her. It smelled appalling and had a harsh and biting draw that was a choking spice to it that eventually turned into a fishy flavor half-way through. It burned unevenly and finally when my stomach started to turn I just threw the darn thing out. The smoke had a good body, but it was wasted on this gorge-raising cigar. I'm staying as far away from Sancho Panza as I can in the future.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"What a difference a few months make"
| Review by: |
RBekk |
| Review Date: |
08/19/2005 |
| Rating: |
7.67 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
I reviewed this cigar several months ago and was sorely disappointed. Construction was appalling, and the flavors were dull and muddy. Wow, what a difference a few months in the humi make! After my first impression, I buried the remainder deep in the humi, only to be brought out in extreme emergency. Since I’m running low on my favorites, I thought now would be a good time to resurrect these and give them a second chance. Construction was still off, with slight unraveling, and slight tunneling, but at least this stick was smokable, and I ended up nubbing it! That is a distinction only a handful of cigars have impressed me enough to burn down to my fingers. I’m not sure if the year spent in my humi infused the flavors of my favorites into these, or if the flavors blossomed on their own, but I was enthralled with the complexity of flavors, and potent but not overpowering body of this stick. If the next few are as good as this one, I might even move them up alongside my other favorites.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
| Quick Rating |
| This cigar SMOKES! This cigar is a DUD! |
|
| Vote Now! |
|
(0) |
|
(0) |
|
Add A Review Of This Cigar
Just fill out the form below to create a rating and review of
this cigar. Once you submit your review you cannot change it.
Please check your spelling and information before clicking the "Submit Your Review" button.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puff.com Daily Digest
Thank you for your interest in the Puff.com Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on Puff.com in our free Daily Digest.
To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.