|
|
Te-Amo No. 14 Churchill Cigar Reviews
Below are the cigar reviews for the Te-Amo No. 14 Churchill. If you would like to add your own
personal cigar review for the Te-Amo No. 14 Churchill please click here.
|
Cigar Vitals |
Te-Amo Cigars
No. 14 Churchill
|
Current Rating
5.07 |
|
|
Size: |
|
7 1/2 x 50 |
|
Shape: |
|
Double Corona |
|
Wrapper: |
|
Mexico |
|
Filler: |
|
Mexico |
|
Binder: |
|
Mexico |
|
MSRP: |
|
$0.00 |
|
| Total Reviews: |
7 |
|
| Average Rating: |
5.07 out of a possible 10 |
|
| Average Price: |
$4.21 |
|
| Discontinued: |
No |
|
| Notes: |
|
| Quick Rating |
| 0% of voters like the Te-Amo - No. 14 Churchill |
|
| Vote Now! |
|
(0) |
|
(1) |
|
"Hmmm...."
| Review by: |
DW |
| Review Date: |
05/07/2008 |
| Rating: |
5.5 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
I heard some pretty bad things about this particular cigar. I saw it in a shop and I decided to see what people were complaining about. At first, I could not see what they found disgusting about it, but as I continued to smoke, a headache grew. The flavor became somewhat harsh. I would not say that it was a horrible cigar, but, I do not think I will try it again.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Avoid this one"
| Review by: |
XLNC |
| Review Date: |
02/26/2008 |
| Rating: |
5.33 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
I was new to cigars, and saw a churchill for $4.00 so I had to jump on it. The flavor was VERY good. Really chocolatey and creamy. Aroma was so good that some older gentleman came up to me and asked me what kind of cigar it was. Unforunately, I smoked two more weeks later and they were utter crap. Nothing like the first one. Aroma was offensive even to me, and the flavor just wasn't there. If you are not very disciminating with cigars, give this a try. Maybe I got lucky with the first one, but I will not be giving these another try.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Good, natural tobacco; not 'great'"
| Review by: |
JB |
| Review Date: |
06/20/2007 |
| Rating: |
7 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
These are great for their price range (in Manhattan, one of the only hand-made cigars you can get for under $6) although definitely lack the complexity of what most consider a 'great' cigar. I enjoy the natural tobacco flavor; although it is (as many have said) fairly one-dimensional: you will either like this quite a bit or hate it. Tend to be a little dry too and perhaps slightly stale, although you can tell these are made very well, and with tobacco that has been grown well, and not adulterated very much, if any, although very basic.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
"100% pure mexican shite"
| Review by: |
Dmoney |
| Review Date: |
01/10/2007 |
| Rating: |
3 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
What a nasty, nasty cigar. I lit it with great anticipation, having heard decent things. A mouldy, rotting vegetation taste dominates throughout. There is a sour, grassy flavor just under that. Couldn't finish it, my mouth tasted like ass for 30 minutes after this smoke. Unequivocally disgusting smoke.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(1) |
 |
(0) |
|
"Foul"
| Review by: |
FredBear |
| Review Date: |
12/15/2006 |
| Rating: |
4.33 |
|
| Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| Appearance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flavor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Notes:
This cigar smelled okay at the shop but maybe that was just the overall pleasant smell of the humidor. This cigar was plain gross and I didn't bother finishing it. Grassy, pollen-like taste and a foul aftertaste. No more mexican smokes for yours truly.
|
| Does this reviewer know this cigar? |
 |
(0) |
 |
(0) |
|
| Quick Rating |
| 0% of voters like the Te-Amo - No. 14 Churchill |
|
| Vote Now! |
|
(0) |
|
(1) |
|
Add A Review Of This Cigar
Just fill out the form below to create a rating and review of
this cigar. Once you submit your review you cannot change it.
Please check your spelling and information before clicking the "Submit Your Review" button.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puff.com Daily Digest
Thank you for your interest in the Puff.com Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on Puff.com in our free Daily Digest.
To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.