MEMBER CIGAR REVIEWS | STAFF CIGAR REVIEWS | CIGAR VIDEOS | ONE ON ONE INTERVIEWS | CIGAR NEWS | CIGAR FORUMS | PIPES | LIFESTYLE | CONTACT
 
Reviews by User
 
"Um..."

Review by: JeffinChi
Review Date: 07/26/2009
Rating: 5.6
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience

Review Notes: At the risk of sounding unpopular - I just don't like it. I paid a little more $$$ for these because of the hype, and the 94 rating by cigar aficionado. I was expecting a full flavored cigar, and instead I received a gorgeous looking cigar with little, if any, taste. I'm not sure if it was stale or what, but this was bland and boring. I thought the exact same thing of the 1932 (or is it 1938) when I picked it up about a year ago, so maybe I just don't care for this padilla line. Great hype, nice label, premium wrapper, but none of that matters if there is no taste. This one put me to sleep and for all that $$$ I spent, it should have knocked my socks off. For the money, get a padron.

Does this reviewer know this cigar? Yes (7) No (5)



   


Sign Up to our
GET IT NOW!






 

Member Cigar Reviews | Staff Cigar Reviews | Cigar Videos | One on One Interviews | Cigar News | Puffcast | Cigar Forums | Lifestyle | Partners | Contact
© 2015 by Caputo Media, LLC. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Ad Blockers Suck! Why?


Puff.com Daily Digest

Thank you for your interest in the Puff.com Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on Puff.com in our free Daily Digest. To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.


Email Address:


Email will come from "donotreply@caputomedia.com". Please whitelist this email address.

Cancel and Return to page