MEMBER CIGAR REVIEWS | STAFF CIGAR REVIEWS | CIGAR VIDEOS | ONE ON ONE INTERVIEWS | CIGAR NEWS | CIGAR FORUMS | PIPES | LIFESTYLE | CONTACT
 
Reviews by User
 
"Tastes old.."

Review by: Travis
Review Date: 06/14/2006
Rating: 6.33
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Appearance
Construction
Flavor
Value
Overall Experience

Review Notes: ...And not in a good way. I've had several of Padron's Anniversary offerings, both the in the '64 and the '26, and for the life of me, I cannot figure out why people like these so much. They're just not that good. They're never nasty, but the taste is always stale and musty. There are notes of chocolate, coffee, and all the other things people go on and on about, but the dominating flavor characteristic is always "old-ness." Not "well-aged," just old. I've said it before and I'll say it again, I'd happily trade two Padron 1926's or 1964's for just one of their regular line cigars. PS this one was a gift. Im through paying good money for these when there are so many better choices out there.

Does this reviewer know this cigar? Yes (10) No (5)



   


Sign Up to our
GET IT NOW!






 

Member Cigar Reviews | Staff Cigar Reviews | Cigar Videos | One on One Interviews | Cigar News | Puffcast | Cigar Forums | Lifestyle | Partners | Contact
© 2015 by Caputo Media, LLC. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Ad Blockers Suck! Why?


Puff.com Daily Digest

Thank you for your interest in the Puff.com Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on Puff.com in our free Daily Digest. To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.


Email Address:


Email will come from "donotreply@caputomedia.com". Please whitelist this email address.

Cancel and Return to page