According
to Chris McCalla, legislative director of the
International Premium Cigar &
Pipe Retailers Association, his organization has learned that the Michigan
state legislature will likely reopen debate on a proposed statewide smoking ban
based on allegedly erroneous information provided by well-funded anti-smoking
forces.
Michigan's State Representatives and Senators have been deadlocked on a
proposal for several months with each preferring their own version of such a
ban. McCalla believes the two chambers are working to approve a statewide
smoking ban by the end of this current session.
"IPCPR members are owners and employees of neighborhood smoke shops across
Michigan, throughout the United States and the world where premium, handmade
cigars are sold to adult consumers," said McCalla. "Their customers are friends
and neighbors who enjoy the pleasures of a good cigar ... and they are voters,"
he added.
McCalla noted that most cigar stores are family-owned small businesses led by
mom-and-pop operators who are pillars of the communities they serve, providing
thousands of jobs and paying millions of dollars annually in payroll, sales and
excise taxes.
According to McCalla, Michigan legislators and the general public are being
deceived by the well-funded anti-smoking organizations into believing what they
hear about second-hand smoke.
"They need to read the 2006 Surgeon General's Report which clearly concludes
that second-hand smoke should not be considered a legitimate health or
environmental hazard. Biased media reports, slanted statements by anti-tobacco
groups and even deliberately erroneous press releases from the Surgeon General's
office contradict the actual findings of the Report," he said.
McCalla referred to a report written by Dr. Jerome Arnett, Jr., a
pulmonologist who lives in Helvetia, West Virginia.
"The abuse of scientific integrity and the generation of faulty outcomes have
led to deception of the American public on a grand scale, draconian government
over-regulation and the squandering of public monies while personal choice and
freedom have been denied to millions of smokers," Arnett wrote.
A recent study published by an environmental chemistry professor supports
McCalla's and Arnett's position.
Barry Dellinger is a professor of environmental chemistry at Louisiana State
University. His research on the environmental effects of combustion was
presented last month at the 236th National Meeting of the American Chemical
Society in Philadelphia. Dellinger found that nonsmokers are impacted primarily
by elements in the air formed during the combustion process of things like coal
in power plants and burning trees, not tobacco. "Wood smoke is the worst,"
Dellinger is quoted as having said, discussing heart and lung health risks.
McCalla challenged the Michigan legislature to demand clarification and
validation for health claims made by the anti-smoking organizations in support
of any statewide smoking ban.
"Information promoting legislation of this magnitude, with its widespread
social and economic impact as well as its deprivation of constitutional rights
of business owners and consumers alike, needs to be documented for public review
and shared in an understandable format," he said.
Comments
As grown men and woman we should have the right to say if we want to be able to smoke in areas that are designated for smokers, if non smokers decide to avoid these areas then so be it, but there should not be a total band on smoking in places if the owners wish to have it as a smoking establishment.
The government is over stepping their authority when passing such laws as these non smoking laws.
I suppose next they will say that it is unlawful to smoke in your own home.
It seems our free country isn't as free any more as it once was and the Politicians are becoming more and more like communists than democratic in manor.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote