I'm titling this article "Things I Can't Taste". I've always wanted to write it but never seem to have gotten around to it. It's interesting having smoked cigars for a long time and being exposed to cigars from all over the world that I still seem to be completely inept in my ability to taste all those funky flavors the professionals find in a cigar.
Now you may think I'm picking on a specific magazine, but honest I'm not. I'm really focusing on my inability to educate my palate in the worldly ways of those people that can actually relate to the ads for $50,000 watches, and half a million dollar cars. I know, I know, you're reading this and you're saying to yourself, "What a complete moron this guy is, he can't even taste Aruban honey nectar in those Hemingway Short Stories". I admit it, I'm honey nectar challenged.
So consider this the first step in my 12 step program, where I announce that "my name is Paul, and I have a palate problem."
I made the mistake of saving many of my back issues of that magazine that has four or five pages dedicated to cigars, and 15 to 20 pages dedicated to ads for that power broker watch that's only available on Madison Avenue in New York. I decided to look through some of them and see if perhaps they could shed some light on the challenged palate that I am trying to come to grips with.
As I was combing through an old issue, December of 2006 to be exact, I found some interesting information. For example, did you know that in the Quintessa Corona, those with a professional palate can taste "overly sweet fruitcake characters"? I guess that sheds some light on my first mistake, I've never taken the chance and eaten any of those Christmas fruitcakes I've been given. I guess I'll be more appreciative next year when that seven pound fruitcake shows up at the front door.
And just to send me deeper into depression, a cigar I've smoked many of, and have come to truly enjoy, the Graycliff Chateau Grand Cru President, seems to present some flavors that I have again missed completely. It seems this 7" x 48 ring gauge cigar is not only smooth, creamy and delicious, but it has notes of "granola, leather, earth and spice". Now isn't that an interesting mixture? I can say that I've eaten a granola bar on a leather couch while residing on earth and wearing old spice, but that just didn't do enough to train my palate to be able to discern these flavors in a cigar. I briefly thought about throwing some dirt, spices, old leather shoes, and whole grain oats in a blender, just to blend them up and have a taste. I had second thoughts though as I was concerned the shoelaces would throw off what I was trying to capture from a flavor perspective.
Leave it to the fine and fertile soils of Nicaragua to be able to produce tastings that include leather, nougat and cherry in the same cigar. If you're looking for this top notch combination, be sure to check out the Oliva Special S No. 4. I know I once had a candy bar that claimed to have a creamy nougat center, but I have a feeling that was not what the fine folks at Oliva had in mind when blending the cigar. I hope they don't run into any trademark infringement with the candy companies.
I further realized my tasting shortcomings when I saw that the Oliveros XL For Men Double Corojo XL/60 had the unique combination of "cedar and apple flavors and a bit of amaretto on the palate". Damn, that's one heck of an after dinner drink. Perhaps the tasters enjoyed this cigar after dinner, while they were enjoying their deserts of apple pie and amaretto? Or then again, perhaps they have that world-renowned, sports car tuned palate that only those professional tasters have. I almost feel like they're flexing their beach muscle like tasting skills at my puny taste buds.
Lastly, as I turned some of the final pages of that old magazine, I sighed in sadness when I realized in all the Montecristo No. 4's I had smoked I had never tasted that combination of "coffee and sweet wood". There was a glimmer of hope however; as I could have sworn that I had tasted "bitter wood" in my Monte 4. Looks like I was close, but no cigar. I do resolve though to pay closer attention next time I am sampling the different flavors of wood.
At least I can lose myself and turn the pages and check out that $5000 a night resort in Bora Bora, because I'm sure most average cigar smokers can relate to that.
Comments
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
On the other hand, I honestly could tell you absolutly nothing about the pipe tobacco I smoke, even when given pause by describing it to a friend. All I can tell you is I like it or I don't. So go figure.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
The point that your snooty magazine is trying to get across is a common way to differentiate one cigar from another. Just as your 'challanged palate' differentiates good cigar from bad cigar, or just an ok cigar.
My favorite cigar is always the one I am smoking at the time. I pair cigars with food. How would you do that if you didn't have some kind of subjective rating system? Preferably your OWN system. Like sorting through a bag of cigars a 'buddy' dropped off on your front door. Or how would you make a cigar recommendations to someone that considers you an expert because you have a very large humidor (considering their tastes over your own).
BTW, The rating system of the magazine in question uses the "green" factor. How much "green" the tobacco company laid into the palm of the publisher. So take them with a pound of salt.
Along those lines, however, there are reasons for trying to get the subtleties of smoke which are so enjoyed by cigar smokers. I have a 'challenged palate' as well but I do try to differentiate cigars and categorize them. I do that for reasons of paring with food and drink, my mood, my past smoking experiences, and my current ones.
Would you smoke a candella wrapped cigar with a Guiness Stout and a steak for example? Or have a Perdomo Cuban Perejo before breakfast?
Some things to do with cigars are just preference. Some come from experience. After smoking cigars for about 20 years, I can tell you what I like and dislike. I also have breadth of experience smoking a Perdomo for breakfast.
All that said, I smoke what I like and try new things to add to my bag of tricks as it were.
Variety is the spice of life and cigar smoking is the endless palate from which I draw my spices.
Bottom line, however you sort, segregate or enjoy your cigar is personal preference. Calling it leathery, spicy, whatever is all in the taste of the cigar smoker and should NEVER be relegated to what any one else thinks.
Have a cigar and relax. That's the reason we smoke them after all.
Robin 'Cigarman'
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
I wonder if reading a review does not influence what you think you tasted. Or maybe you volunteered for a review on some blog and now feel stupid if you don't at least act like you tasted something other than tobacco. Expectations are known to flavor subjective opinions.
I, for one, think most of these reviews are boring. It is time for something else.
Scratch and sniff reviews, anyone?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Don't get me wrong...I'm not saying these flavors are not there; I simply cannot taste them. Oh well, back to my cave.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Whenever I hear these outrageous descriptions of all the subtle and exotic flavors I'm missing in the sticks I enjoy, my mind invariably drifts to a long-forgotten Chrysler television ad in which Ricardo Montalban describes the "rich Corinthian leather" in the Cordoba - and I have a good laugh.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
These seem to be marketing ploys by the marketing peeps to lure us to the cigar..whatever.
Yes it is snooty, it's an uppity culture, but for some reason, these "Hints of flavors" are used to make tobacco seem exotic, to keep pace with all the advertising "Allure" that most of the advertisers use for their b.s. products.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
I rate them as Great-Good-Bad........and Strong-Medium-Mild.
I'm in the middle of trying out my Thompson sampler package......I'll find a forum somewhere where I can discuss with others my findings. I will say that 3 sticks into it...Two have been Good, and one has been Bad. The Chavon was Bad....the Eros, and Belmondo were Good.....
As for the article.......I liked it!
Thanks.
A.......
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote