Quote:
Originally Posted by Corona Gigante
The Democrats implemented a "pay-as-you-go" budget policy back in March. It basically means that the government will not introduce any new spending without a way to pay for it. Apparently, they are applying this policy retroactively onto the war spending. I think this is fair. If people who support the war have to pay for it out of their own pockets instead of passing the debt down to their grandchildren they might think differently about an indefinite occupation.
Just my $0.02.
|
We should not have to borrow any money for this, and expecting the future generations to pay for it is not fair either. Maybe this will decide how important the war is.
Is it worth spending out of pocket for it? Like the addage, "If you don't have the cash to buy it, you do not need it."