|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| CIGAR REVIEWS | CIGAR VIDEOS | INTERVIEWS | CIGAR NEWS | OUR TWO CENTS BLOGS | PUFFCAST | CIGAR FORUMS | PUFF LIFESTYLE | CONTACT |
| ||||||
This is a discussion on A not so great graycliff? within the Cigar Questions forums, part of the General Cigar Discussion category; OK I Smoked a Graycliff Profesionale PG (Robusto) and I have to say I was somewhat disappointed. I'm told this ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Young Puffer Fish
|
A not so great graycliff?
OK I Smoked a Graycliff Profesionale PG (Robusto) and I have to say I was somewhat disappointed. I'm told this is to be a wonderful smoke. However the construction was very loose. The burn was very uneven. I had to fix several runs wile smoking it... and it didn't last as long as other Robustos that I have tried. the taste was enjoyable. and was deffinatly worth finishing. I'm just curious if any one else has had this problem. Is it just one bad cigar out of a bunch. I do have another one and it seems to be just as loose. What do you think,has anyone else had a bad experiance with Graycliff smoke? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Elder Puffer Fish Leader
|
Re: A not so great graycliff?
Sounds like it was underfilled
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Young Puffer Fish
|
Re: A not so great graycliff?
I think the high msrp leads people to believe these are top shelf smokes. In my opinion they are yard gars at best. At least that is the case of the two I have tried, the 1666 and crystal series.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Puffer Fish with some spikes
|
Re: A not so great graycliff?
The price is mostly due to taxes, but mine have all been good so far. That being said even with the cost it is still just a cigar and subject to plugging, and anything else that could go wrong with any cigar. I would say that if you just didn't like the taste then that cigar just isn't for your taste, but I have also found that after a bad first smoke when I try them again I end up liking that cigar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Young Puffer Fish
|
Re: A not so great graycliff?
I did like the taste of this smoke. It was nice mild smoke.
I got two of these as part of a 90+ rated supreme combo. I'm just confused. How could such shotty construction get a 90+ rating? Is the construction of these sticks inconsistent? Did they come out of a bum batch? Has anyone else tried these and had better experience with the construction? |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Puffer Fish with some spikes
|
Re: A not so great graycliff?
I think it's just a bad batch
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Elder Puffer Fish Leader
|
Re: A not so great graycliff?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
One Shot
|
Re: A not so great graycliff?
I can't stand a under filled cigar!!! They draw way to easy and burn hot!! At least you only got 2 of them.
__________________
http://www.puff.com/Content/One-on-O...young-gun.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Young Puffer Fish
|
Re: A not so great graycliff?
I have three more of the crystal series left I will give them more time and try again. Possible these are just not the flavor I like, others will differ. The two I smoked were well made though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Elder Puffer Fish Leader
|
Re: A not so great graycliff?
The Professionals are ok. I only purchase when they are on sale. They are not as full bodied or strong as advertised.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Young Puffer Fish
|
Re: A not so great graycliff?
Well This morning I stepped outside with the second one I had. I kept an open mid through out the journey. I must say I'm glad that I didn't let any preconceived conceptions about this cigar get to me. It felt much better the second time around, Seemed to burn rather nicely. The first one must have been under filled like you said..
![]()
__________________
Keep On, Keep'n On! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| graycliff , great |
![]() |
||
A not so great graycliff?
|
||
| Thread Tools | |
|
|