|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| CIGAR REVIEWS | CIGAR VIDEOS | INTERVIEWS | CIGAR NEWS | OUR TWO CENTS BLOGS | PUFFCAST | CIGAR FORUMS | PUFF LIFESTYLE | CONTACT |
| ||||||
This is a discussion on Discussion Topic: Total Tobacco Ban. within the General Cigar Discussion forums, part of the The Cigar Lounges at Puff category; How exactly can places justify banning dip or chewing tobacco? I mean, they wave around their discredited studies on the ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#16 |
|
Custom Titles Suck
|
Re: Discussion Topic: Total Tobacco Ban.
How exactly can places justify banning dip or chewing tobacco?
I mean, they wave around their discredited studies on the ill effects of second hand smoke, but what harm could possibly be done to anyone (else) by dipping? Why not ban chewing gum and sunflower seeds? |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Leading Puffer Fish
|
Re: Discussion Topic: Total Tobacco Ban.
If it was illegal, I wouldn't do it. But it makes my blood pressure go up just thinking about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Elder Jungle Leader
|
Re: Discussion Topic: Total Tobacco Ban.
Quote:
![]()
__________________
"When I have found... a weary brain soothed, and calm, refreshing sleep obtained by a cigar, I have felt grateful to God and have blessed His name" - Charles H. Spurgeon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Ya Damn Right
|
Re: Discussion Topic: Total Tobacco Ban.
Quote:
__________________
Fight My Brute http://bam-bam1723.mybrute.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Evolving Lead Puffer Fish
|
Re: Discussion Topic: Total Tobacco Ban.
The smoking nazi's want to completely ban smoking. They know that will never happen-so the next step is to tax it so that no one can afford to buy their smokes. That just creates black markets which makes tobacco similiar to pot.
__________________
I've been kicked by the wind, robbed by the sleet Had my head stoved in, but I'm still on my feet and I'm still... willin' Little Feat/Lowell George |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
E-Man
|
Re: Discussion Topic: Total Tobacco Ban.
I work in the oil and gas industry and I see these idiots out campaigning about windfall profits tax to lower prices. That has to be the stupidest idea I have ever heard of, (in order to reduce price?)
. Tobacco is the same way, we will raise the tax in order to pay for something that we should not be involved in, and everyone just accepts and re-elects these idiots. Every new tax makes fewer people pick a larger portion of the bill. How about we vote so normal citizens in to office, and set some term limits on congress, just like the president. Everyday watching these political idiots makes me sick to my stomach. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Tatuaje Whore
|
Re: Discussion Topic: Total Tobacco Ban.
Sin tax... because we are bad we must pay. Alcohol: TAX IT! Tobacco: TAX IT! Ignore that most of us here pay our taxes & commit no crimes. We are killing people left & right.
McDonalds artery clogging burgers? They give out toys & let seniors drink cheap coffee! Processed foods with enough salt to cure us? Food for emergencies! Cola companies fattening us with sugar? It tastes better than our unhealthy tap water! See... everything else is ok. Just the burning of natural leaves will do you in. SMOG, pollution, chemicals in food, etc... that is all hype.
__________________
-Danny |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Maturing Puffer Fish
|
Re: Discussion Topic: Total Tobacco Ban.
The question was, would you continue to smoke cigars if they were made illegal, a la marijuana?
I've been pondering for quite a few minutes... would it be any different than, say, smoking a Cuban cigar today? I would seriously consider civil disobedience in the face of an unjust law... |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Dumb ass!
|
Re: Discussion Topic: Total Tobacco Ban.
Quote:
gotta watch out for the second hand spit! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Young Puffer Fish
|
Re: Discussion Topic: Total Tobacco Ban.
That would be one big NO! I'll smoke whatever I like no matter what my asinine government decides to do about tobacco.
I'll never buy the secondhand smoke crap either. People complained about the smell of tobacco before they started preaching about secondhand smoke. Man, I loathe perfume but I wouldn't want anyone to ban it. Trust me, if all tobacco smoke smelled like flowers or fresh baked cookies this would be a non issue. ![]() Rant over. Time to enjoy a cigar! |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Certified Tobacco Pyro
|
Re: Discussion Topic: Total Tobacco Ban.
People don't like the smell of cigars? That's fine and I can accept that. Can we have a ban if someone is cooking some smelly-assed seafood that I don't like the smell of and it drifts over to my yard?
Well, smoking is a health issue you say? What if I'm alergic to tree pollen? Surely there are people out there that are allergic to pollen. Nuke all trees. Even get hit by a rock when you were a kid or trip on some loose soil on the ground? Let's ban that too. Too many damn stupid people in this country that can't mind their own business. If tobacco was illegal, I'd still smoke it. Hell, if I could find the right suppliers, maybe I could smuggle it in and become rich like the Kennedy clan and financially set up my future generations.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Awaiting Confirmation
|
Re: Discussion Topic: Total Tobacco Ban.
Just thought I'd toss this into the mix, since people mentioned pot. Got it from a motorcycle discussion list.
Today, a bill to eliminate all federal penalties for marijuana possession was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives. "The Personal Use of Marijuana by Responsible Adults Act of 2008," introduced by Congressman Barney Frank (D-Mass.), would eliminate the threat of arrest and prison for the possession of up to 3.5 ounces of marijuana and/or the not-for-profit transfer of up to one ounce of marijuana. It would not affect federal laws prohibiting selling marijuana for profit, importing and exporting marijuana, or cultivating marijuana. It also would not affect any state or local laws and regulations. Because almost all marijuana arrests are made by local and state police, the primary impact of this federal bill is twofold: First, it would offer protection to people who are apprehended with marijuana in federal buildings or on federal land (such as national parks); and, second, the bill sends a message to state governments that the federal government is now open to the notion of states reducing their marijuana penalties, too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Young Puffer Fish
|
Re: Discussion Topic: Total Tobacco Ban.
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Mustard & Biscuits
|
Re: Discussion Topic: Total Tobacco Ban.
[SIZE=7]I smell a revolution building
[/SIZE]
__________________
[SIZE=4]It's not the cigars they fear.....It is thy flame they will receive when I smoke them. [/SIZE]
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Alpha Puffer Fish
|
Re: Discussion Topic: Total Tobacco Ban.
Quote:
''Our Federal workers and the thousands of people who visit Federal facilities will now be protected from the risk of secondhand smoke,'' the President said in his weekly radio broadcast from the Oval Office." Had they not done this, they would have had to provide non-smokers with smoke free work areas or face tons of lawsuits. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...5BC0A961958260 I agree that a busniess of any kind should have the option to decide. I'm just disappointed that some places permit the smoking of cigarettes, but not cigars, especially bars, pools halls, and bowling alleys.
__________________
I draw, but I don't inhale. My $s go down in drink or up in smoke! Help find cures, join Team Helix. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| ban , discussion , tobacco , topic , total |
![]() |
||
Discussion Topic: Total Tobacco Ban.
|
||
| Thread Tools | |
|
|