Not excited about Padron 1964 anniversary-only one?

[Firridge]

Try another one, even though they can get into your bank account in a rather large way, IMO they are the most consistent in construction and flavor of any cigar being produced. That being said the flavor may not meet your needs but at least give them another try or try a 26.

[surefire m2]

I have to agree try another. the 1st one i tried i liked the second i appreciated..

[makismd]

Originally Posted by surefire m2

I have to agree try another. the 1st one i tried i liked the second i appreciated..

Well I followed it with a La flor DL and I loved it. The 1st time I tried it.

[Bax]

I preffer the 26 over the 64, but still like the V better.

[gnukfu]

Please send all those crappy Padron Anniversaries to me -I do not want you torturing yourself. I will smoke them with the utmost respect and care.

[BlackDog]

I've got one of these in my coolerdor. I'm going to have to try it tomorrow night when I have more time to sit and contemplate the world.

[Rob]

Originally Posted by surefire m2

I have to agree try another. the 1st one i tried i liked the second i appreciated..

I liked my 2nd on much more than the first. The bad part is now I'm buying them....

[andrewsutherland2002]

I've only smoked one also. It was the best NC stick that I have ever smoked.
I absolutely loved it!

[icehog3]

I will agree with others that almost every one I have smoked has been perfectly constructed, and actually felt on the solid side to me.

As my tastes evolved, I found the 1926 Natural to be more suitable for my palate. Excellent cigars, though probably overpriced by comparison.

[oldforge]

Originally Posted by makismd

Well I followed it with a La flor DL and I loved it. The 1st time I tried it.

One of the strongest features of the 1964 is an amazingly long finish--I swear I could still taste the last one I smoked two hours after I finished it. Since I loved the taste I would not want to have another smoke afterwards.

[smokepiper]

I have noticed some difference in these cigars lately. I recall them being fairly dense and heavy in the hand. I recently smoked one in a blind taste and really wasn't a fan. It felt underfilled and burned really fast. The flavor was nice, but not as I remember. Had the nice Nicaraguan flavor, but had little complexity.

I wonder if the blend has changed? Perhaps Padron has changed something. For the price, this was not as enjoyable a cigar as it had been in the past.

D

[tsolomon]

It seems like you might have been expecting something else in the way of taste from it. If you were expecting a lot of spice and pepper, I could see where you might be disapointed. It is a very rich smoke that is well balanced with some pepper and spice. It's smooth from start to finish with a chocolate or espresso like flavor that makes it an enjoyable smoke. I find that a nice bourbon or rum goes real well with the PAM 64.

[pro2625]

The PAM's are pretty good but I like the olivia V's a lot better

[neoflex]

Consider it a blessing in disguise. One of the great things of having such a wide variety of smokes available to us. What you may like I may not or vice versa. I happen to love PAMS but absolutely hated the few Serie Gs I have smoked. It would be boring if we were all forced to smoke the same thing. My rule of thumb usually is to give every smoke a few tries before writing them off though as taste can be effected by many things including mood so definitely give them another shot. I would also try the natty as there is a difference in taste but if you decide you don't like them, well again consider yourself Lucky.

[andrewk]

Originally Posted by robofan

I prefer the 26 line over the 64's. If you like heavy cigars try the Taboo Twists.

Heaviest solid cigar ever!