|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| CIGAR REVIEWS | CIGAR VIDEOS | INTERVIEWS | CIGAR NEWS | OUR TWO CENTS BLOGS | PUFFCAST | CIGAR FORUMS | PUFF LIFESTYLE | CONTACT |
| ||||||
This is a discussion on Large Ring Guage within the General Cigar Discussion forums, part of the The Cigar Lounges at Puff category; I am still waiting for someone to explain how a smaller rg could have more flavor since most of the ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#16 |
|
alliroG
|
Re: Large Ring Guage
I am still waiting for someone to explain how a smaller rg could have more flavor since most of the flavor comes from the wrapper and with a smaller rg you have less wrapper to suck on.
That just doesn't make any sense. I will settle for a 46-48 if I must but 50 and up are my favorites.
__________________
In the interest of not boring you to death with siglines that never change I have decided to stop using them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Edicion όριο
|
Re: Large Ring Guage
Quote:
I like lanceros, petit coronas, coronas and the occasional robustos. However that does not mean I will not smoke the larger cigars.
__________________
I live vicariously through myself! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Full grown Puffer Fish
|
Re: Large Ring Guage
Quote:
![]()
__________________
"I get complete satisfaction out of hearing glass break and watching things burn" - Former "Disturbed" Co-Worker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Not here
|
Re: Large Ring Guage
More flavor because you get more of the wrappers flavor and the blend is more concentrated with less "filler". The ratio of wrapper to filler is less with smaller rg cigars so you taste more wrapper. I am not a fan of jawbreakers.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
alliroG
|
Re: Large Ring Guage
But if it is a longer cigar doesn't the overall amount of filler work out to be the same? And if it does, doesn't that mean you are spending as much time with less wrapper since the same section will be in your mouth the whole time?
__________________
In the interest of not boring you to death with siglines that never change I have decided to stop using them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Maturing Puffer Fish
|
Re: Large Ring Guage
Quote:
Generally speaking, I prefer to smoke torpedos/pyramids which are about a 52-55 RG, but at the same time I have smoked and enjoyed very much the Tat Brown & Red labels which I believe are a 42 RG. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Not here
|
Re: Large Ring Guage
Quote:
BTW, I am big guy too and I could care less about how I look smoking a small rg cigar because they are so dang good! Nothing over 54 for me and the ones 52/54 are very rare for me. To me somebody that has a huge rg cigar in thier mouth looks more uncomfortable than anything.Last edited by NCRadioMan; 09-17-2008 at 12:40 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Smokin and Jokin
|
Re: Large Ring Guage
I don't care how I look with a cigar. I'm just as goofy looking without a cigar as I am with a cigar so it doesn't matter to me!
I like around 50-52 RG or smaller.
__________________
[SIZE=3]George[/SIZE] - I'm getting married!, don't cry ladies!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
alliroG
|
Re: Large Ring Guage
Quote:
I dunno. What you are saying makes sense, I guess, but I have had the opposite results. When I go to a smaller rg it just seems like there is less flavor.
__________________
In the interest of not boring you to death with siglines that never change I have decided to stop using them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Not here
|
Re: Large Ring Guage
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Huge Puffer Fish packed with spikes
|
Re: Large Ring Guage
While I've smoked 60'ish cigars and liked them they just aren't a staple in my humi. I prefer a robusto 50-52 overall and have grown to love lanceros. If you shun the thin RG because you do not feel it makes you look like the fat-cat in the eyes of on-lookers you are really missing out. Most of my time is with a robusto, but if I really want to kick back and have a great smoking experience I'm hoping to find a thin RG in the humi.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Young Puffer Fish
|
Re: Large Ring Guage
La Gloria Series R #7 was my #1 cigar. I like larger ring gauges. My new fav is the Juan Lopez Epicure #1 which is 6 x 54. It is an awesome cigar. I prefer rg form 50 on up. Used to smoke the RyJ cedro #2 which is in the 30's I believe.Not bad at all just doesn't last long enough for me. I guess it depends on what I am doing and how long I have to smoke.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Maturing Puffer Fish
|
Re: Large Ring Guage
i was strictly a 50 ring guage and up guy until Smokinape sent me a petite corona that blew my socks off, now i will smoke any and everything that is natural wrapper, and long filler...if it tastes yummy it tastes yummy!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Being interesting
|
Re: Large Ring Guage
Quote:
Basically it breaks down to ratio like our friend said Area of the Wrapper = Circumference times the height Area of the filler = Height times (radius squared times pi) So on a 5x40 corona: wrapper area = 5x40/64 x pi = 9.8125 Square inches filler area = 5x(40/64 div by 2)squared x pi = 1.53 Cubic Inches ratio 9.8:1.5 or 6.53 versus a 5x54 belicoso wrapper area = 5x54/64 x pi = 13.24 filler area = 5x(54/64 div by 2)squared x pi = 2.79 cubic inches ratio 13.2 : 2.79 or 4.74 So on the smaller corona the ratio is 27% higher of Wrapper to filler |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Poop thrower
|
Re: Large Ring Guage
I guess I would have to say I like medium ~~ 48 ring gauge cigars. Too large and I don't feel comfortable smoking them. But if they are too small ~~ 40 ring gauge then they really don't have enough flavor to satisfy me. Als I have noticed that smaller ring gauge cigars tend to have more tunneling problems than larger ring gauge ones.
__________________
"He was a mean little man that smoked mean little cigars. I was never able to determine if his disposition was caused by the cigars or if the cigars were more of an extension of his personality." Tredegar |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| guage , large , ring |
![]() |
||
Large Ring Guage
|
||
| Thread Tools | |
|
|