|
|
|
 |
|
||||||
 |
CIGAR REVIEWS | CIGAR VIDEOS | INTERVIEWS | CIGAR NEWS | OUR TWO CENTS BLOGS | PUFFCAST | CIGAR FORUMS | PUFF LIFESTYLE | CONTACT |
| ||||||
This is a discussion on Padron - 1964 or 1926? within the General Cigar Discussion forums, part of the The Cigar Lounges at Puff category; I used to prefer the 1926 maduro but now I prefer the 1964 natural....
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
10-22-2009, 07:27 PM
|
#16 |
|
Edicion όριο
|
Re: Padron - 1964 or 1926?
I used to prefer the 1926 maduro but now I prefer the 1964 natural.
__________________
I live vicariously through myself! 
|
|
|
|
10-22-2009, 08:20 PM
|
#17 |
|
Puffer Fish with some spikes
|
Re: Padron - 1964 or 1926?
I seem to like maduro's better which is why I stay away from natural
maybe I will try a 1926 natural next time not sure but next time i will try a longer smoke..35 is way too short for how much it cost don't get me wrong it was still a great cigar much better then the delicas, but one thing is for sure this is getting to be a very expensive hobby =) Last edited by denarok; 10-22-2009 at 08:29 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
10-25-2009, 07:46 PM
|
#18 |
|
Evolving Lead Puffer Fish
|
Re: Padron - 1964 or 1926?
[QUOTE=commonsenseman;2719387]They are both excellent cigars IMO. I would say the '64 is slightly spicier, while the '26 is slightly smoother. But again I would highly recommended either.
What he said. I smoke the 1926 once or twice a month and love them.
__________________
2012.. Clinton/ Palin 
|
|
|
|
|
10-26-2009, 01:46 AM
|
#19 |
|
Full grown Puffer Fish
|
Re: Padron - 1964 or 1926?
Both excellent cigars, but I prefer the'64. My regular is a natural '64 Exclusivo.
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| 1926 , 1964 , padron |
 |
||
Padron - 1964 or 1926?
|
||
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
