Poll: Is CS moving towards an "R" rating?

[IHT]

yep, that's pretty damn cool.

[Da Klugs]

Originally Posted by DAFU

Check out my new avatar.............

Nice.

And back to the topic...

[radar]

Originally Posted by DAFU

Check out my new avatar.............

I like it!

[Churchlady]

Dafu, love the new avatar!


Hey, I never asked to be the purity police!!! Leave me out of this, although SH, thanks for the vote of confidence. I agree, PDS is the king gorilla here and all shall bow to his will....

[BayouDawg]

Man, I go out of town for a few days and miss all of the fun! Now I gotta spend the rest of my time searching for whatever post(s) touched all of this off. (I gotta know!)

bd

[kscotty]

Hmm. YES it is moving in that direction.

...and your issue is...???

Carry-on...

[God]

Originally Posted by DonJefe

Oh man Khat said PC! A PC Jungle is a scary thought!!!!! As others have said, I think we are PG-13 and it seems for the most part the members here know the limits.

PC??? If it gets to that I may have to find another hobby... The general public usually doesn't find any political correctness in cigar smokers so why would anyone expect our posts to follow "political correctness"... but then again it takes a lot to offend me so I'm probably a poor one to ask.

[God]

By the way... I voted for the "doesn't matter to me"

[IHT]

yep, god, vengence is yours.

[Steeltown]

I don't know what to vote for - I personally don't mind if it heads that direction - as of right now, it's far from "R" rated. It doesn't even come up on the radar as the potential of "R" rating, based on what I have seen.

To me, if you are posting completely naked, uncensored women, then it is R. Would that be a bad thing? Not to me, but I surf this at work and work only, so I wouldn't really want to see a full screen shot of a naked chick (well, I would, but I shouldn't). Any other pictures of semi-clothed women are fine w/ me.

My vote is that I don't care if the forum goes there or not, but I definitely don't think we are there right now.

[LasciviousXXX]

Nice avatar BTW Steeltown

Really goes well with the theme of the thread.

[Steeltown]

Originally Posted by LasciviousXXX

Nice avatar BTW Steeltown

Really goes well with the theme of the thread.

I thought I'd unveil it at the most appropriate location. It's a PG-13 avatar. Now if she turned around and moved her hand, it would be another story. I can't take credit for it-got it from another site, but I do like it - and she's rocking the Black and Gold.

[Uniputt]

If Steeltown's avatar is okay, then I'm going to assume mine is too. Heck, it's just a cartoon....and a clothed one, at that.

Besides, I asked everyone if it was inappropriate when I changed to it. And everyone seemed to enjoy it, with no complaints.

Personally, I think can't really add any more to what's already been said. I think we do a great job of policing ourselves. But every poster has to realize that many of us are viewing in sensitive areas; such as work or around young children. I would certainly hope that there would be a warning before anything objectionable popped up on the screen. I mean, it's just common courtesy.....and no one can have a problem with that, can they?

Every other forum I am a member of explicitly require a warning. People coming here and posting should know better......it's practically become basic internet decorum for these type of boards. Why is that so hard for people?

[IHT]

i'm in agreement on your avitar, as i don't have a problem with it (it's a cartoon)...

but i could see how some people might have had an issue with the "title" of a topic.

[Franksmith]

I think it has been a a hard core "R" for sometime now and is sliding right into XXX at a fast pace. Avatars, signature lines, language and especially videos without warnings.

I have been participating a lot less because of it... I feel it is not in my best interest to be around the content.

Please no flames... just my opinion.