|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| CIGAR REVIEWS | CIGAR VIDEOS | INTERVIEWS | CIGAR NEWS | OUR TWO CENTS BLOGS | PUFFCAST | CIGAR FORUMS | PUFF LIFESTYLE | CONTACT |
| ||||||
This is a discussion on Peterson vs. Boswell within the General Pipe Forum forums, part of the Pipe Smokers Forums category; Dear Club Stogie Members, I started pipe smoking about a month ago. I went down to the local tobacconist and ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Young Puffer Fish
|
Peterson vs. Boswell
Dear Club Stogie Members,
I started pipe smoking about a month ago. I went down to the local tobacconist and purchased a Kriswill bent that the tobacconist recommended and some aromatic tobacco. I've been greatly enjoying it and overall it has been a grand experience. For my second pipe I was looking to buy a Peterson. Lately I've been enthralled with that company and I can't wait to buy one. A person whom I respect greatly and is experienced in pipes says that it would be a better move to buy a Boswell instead. For the 50-75 USD range what do you recommend? Pete or Boswell? Thanks for your help! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Full grown Puffer Fish
|
Re: Peterson vs. Boswell
Why not one of each?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Young Puffer Fish
|
Re: Peterson vs. Boswell
I should say which one ought I to purchase first?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
No longer a community member.
|
Re: Peterson vs. Boswell
I have a Pete and I am not overly impressed with it. It is a good pipe for the money but not great. I have not heard any negatives toward Boswells at all. There are many Savinelli's and Stanwells in that same price range. I have a Stanwell on the way and my savinelli Tundra is by far my best and most favorite pipe. I also have 2 Bjarnes which are excellent pipes and since the man who makes them has passed away they will soon become more sought after. I would say to research and learn about those 5 makers more before you make a decision. I bought a new Bjarne just because I learned that he had passed.
If you have your heart set on a pete or a Boswell, I would get the Boswell. Plus you can special order pipes from him even if they aren't in his current lineup. Hope this helps. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Huge Puffer Fish packed with spikes
|
Re: Peterson vs. Boswell
personally i'd go w/the pete, especially in the $50/$75 range-i'd go w/an estate pete as the newer ones in that range leave something to be desired from what i hear, not to mention an estate's already broken in-you could check online etailers, ebay or the WTS forums which will soon be available to you if you stick around & keep posting-i just got my 1st pete system standard & am pretty impressed
__________________
There's nothing so bad in life that it can't be made worse by a lousy cigar. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Young Puffer Fish
|
Re: Peterson vs. Boswell
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Puffer Fish with some spikes
|
Re: Peterson vs. Boswell
You are talking two different animals. Pete's are a manufactured pipe and Boswells are hand crafyed. Petes are steeped in pipe history and tradition. Boswells represent great value for the dollar. If you fancy something unique, I would go with the Boswell. If you are looking for something more traditional, get the Pete. I own both and I like them very much. Choice of a pipe is a very personal thing, and can be influenced by more that just the price. The most important thing is to buy what pleases you..and that includes everything for a $7 MM cob to the most expensive Dunhill or hand crafted pipe. I would suggest that in the beginning you not purchase a really expensive pipe until you get further opportunity to explore your preferences.
Ken
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Puffer Fish with some spikes
|
Re: Peterson vs. Boswell
I cannot comment on the Boswell other than they look like nice pipes.
I've recently started smoking two new pipes that I received two weeks ago: a Stanwell Majestic and a Peterson Killarney. These are both $70 pipes First off, I don't like the finish on the Pete Killarney compared to the Stanwell...it's some sort of varnish...but I intend on removing the finish and going with a nice waxed look (as dubinthedam did to his). I think it will smoke, look and feel better after. Aside from the finish, the Stanwell smoked awesome right out of the box compared to the Pete. Perhaps it has something to do with the bowl-coating on the Stanwell..but it smoked so much cooler. However, now that I've had a chance to smoke each around 6-7 times...I'm finding the differences to be less and less. I've read that Peterson's take a little more time to break-in and so far my findings hold true. I don't know if it's due to the varnish finish but I have to be a lot more cautious with the heat build-up in the Pete right now. I bought a pre-republic Peterson off of eBay last weekend for $52 and I'm looking forward to trying it out. It appears to be in great condition and it will be my first good-quality estate pipe purchase. I'm anxious to see how a 60+ year old pipe smokes! I really wouldn't worry about buying an estate pipe as long as it's from a reputable eBay seller. They clean those things up darned well!! I've also ordered another new Peterson which I'm hoping will arrive in 2 weeks. It's a Peterson Spigot...and it looks so purty!! It's a $170 pipe...so I'm looking forward to comparing the Killarney (at $70), the estate (at $52) and the Spigot (at $170).If this didn't help at all...sorry for the confusion I may have added. ![]()
__________________
Bryan Taking life one day at a time...and enjoying every second of it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Coffee Cow with Pipe
|
Re: Peterson vs. Boswell
I have two non-system, non-P-Lip, Petes - both top-drawer, burn to ash, excellent smokers.
I know someone with two Boswells - same report. I know someone else who says new pipe smokers benefit from buying cobs and taking some time to sort out what lovely piece of meerschaum or briar they want later. When they know more - so they don't have to guess any more than necessary. Not that there's anything wrong with guessing. I guess.
__________________
Smoke meditatively - drink globally. Best regards, Mister Moo Last edited by Mister Moo; 08-21-2008 at 08:52 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
slackerfish
|
Re: Peterson vs. Boswell
Quote:
Getting a cob(or 3) and taking your time sounds like your best bet. I have heard nothing but good things about Boswells and I have had a few bad experiences with Peterson pipes(love their tobacco). Ken's/pirate's advice should give you some food for thought. They are 2 completely different animals.
__________________
Good judgement comes from experience and a lotta' that comes from bad judgement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
No longer a community member.
|
Re: Peterson vs. Boswell
I have one Peterson with the P-lip and it does take some getting use to but it does smoke very well and it is in the $70 range.
I also have one Boswell it also smokes very well. The thing I like about doing business with the Boswell's is I can get on the phone and talk to them about the pipes to me that helps. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Young Puffer Fish
|
Re: Peterson vs. Boswell
You have been giving alot of good answers to go by.Myself i enjoy my petersons.And i have two seven day sets.I have a boswell also.And savin ellis.There all good smokers.If you like boswells they are wonderfull people to deal with and they treat you like your part of the family.They also blend there own tobacco.And where your pretty new to pipe smoking they can help and give you some good ideas as to how to start out.So what ever you do good luck.Pipe smoking is a wonderfull hobby and very relaxing.So enjoy.
Alan ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Puffer Fish with some spikes
|
Re: Peterson vs. Boswell
Quote:
I found myself in the same situation as you are in. I started pipe smoking about two months ago and started with a cob. When I decided to buy a nicer pipe, it was a toss up between a Peterson and a Boswell just like you. I decided to go with Boswell, and I'm very happy with my decision. It smokes very well, and they even gave me a couple of ounces of free tobacco. They're a great company who makes great pipes. However, that's not to say Peterson's are bad pipes. I've never smoked one but have heard great things about them. The next pipe on my shopping list is acutally a Peterson Aran Billiard with a fishtail stem. Hope this helps!
__________________
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal labotamy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
he that puffeth
|
Re: Peterson vs. Boswell
With a Peterson be sure to check the drilling and that the holes line up. I have 2 Petey's, both required "modifications" to make them smokable. IMHO the workmanship is poor, perhaps as they machine mass-produced instead of a human taking the time to even look inside at the holes.
__________________
Ron aka RJ aka RJPuffs -- Old age isn't too bad, when you consider the alternative. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Young Puffer Fish
|
Re: Peterson vs. Boswell
Thank you everyone for your quick and helpful responses! Has anybody else had any problems with Peterson pipes similar to those that RJpuffs had? It is very concerning that they would be so careless as to let that happen to two of their pipes. I hope it was just a fluke, and that isn't the quality of their workmanship on all of their pipes. I am still considering what to get, but I'm sure your suggestions will come in handy. Thank you very much and God bless!
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| boswell , peterson |
![]() |
||
Peterson vs. Boswell
|
||
| Thread Tools | |
|
|