|
|
|
 |
|
||||||
 |
CIGAR REVIEWS | CIGAR VIDEOS | INTERVIEWS | CIGAR NEWS | OUR TWO CENTS BLOGS | PUFFCAST | CIGAR FORUMS | PUFF LIFESTYLE | CONTACT |
| ||||||
This is a discussion on Padilla 1948 Review within the Non-Habanos Reviews forums, part of the General Cigar Discussion category; I liked the 48. Not as much as i liked the 32 but it was still a great cigar. The ...
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
06-23-2009, 04:51 PM
|
#16 |
|
I am my brothers keeper!
|
Re: Padilla 1948 Review
I liked the 48. Not as much as i liked the 32 but it was still a great cigar. The 68 was just ok IMO.
__________________
I am my brothers keeper. |
|
|
|
06-23-2009, 05:15 PM
|
#17 |
|
Full grown Puffer Fish
|
Re: Padilla 1948 Review
I had a 1948 robusto over the weekend from the Padilla sampler that I think a lot of people in this thread are referring to. I thought it was a solid 'gar and didn't pick up any chemical notes like others have mentioned. The only thing I noticed is that it was a little bit bland when compared to the '68 which I thought was a solid corojo cigar. I still haven't tried the 1932 yet... Maybe this weekend!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
06-25-2009, 07:35 PM
|
#18 |
|
Full grown Puffer Fish
|
Re: Padilla 1948 Review
Thanks for the review - I too prefer the '32 & '68. This (the 194
 is the "woodiest" tasting cigar I have smoked in quite a while, maybe ever! |
|
|
|
|
06-26-2009, 01:27 PM
|
#19 |
|
Puffer Fish with some spikes
|
Re: Padilla 1948 Review
I purchased the CI sampler as well and had a very similar experiencew/ the "chemical taste". I am gong to let them sit a few months and revisit.
|
|
|
|
|
06-26-2009, 02:11 PM
|
#20 |
|
Full grown Puffer Fish
|
Re: Padilla 1948 Review
Thanks for the review. After reading this, I think I'll let mine sit awhile longer.
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| 1948 , padilla , review |
 |
||
Padilla 1948 Review
|
||
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
