Review of a 601 year old pre-Columbian cigar - Puff Cigar Discussion Forums
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 22 Old 04-01-2013, 01:37 PM Thread Starter
Maturing Puffer Fish
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Rochester
Posts: 111
  
Review of a 601 year old pre-Columbian cigar

Some of you may recall about a year ago when the cigar world was rocked by the archaeological discovery of 828 perfectly preserved 600-year-old pre-Columbian cigars. They were in pristine and smokable condition because of their storage below ground in clay jar humidors. Here is a link to the original story - World's Most Expensive Cigar: 600 Year Old Pre-Columbian Mayan Cigars To Be Auctioned


I was very excited to learn that they were being offered for auction to the public by a prominent online cigar dealer, but my offer of $102 fell far short of the $507,000 winning bid from an anonymous bidder for the entire collection.


Determined to sample one of these ancient cigars from the original inventors of all cigars, I scoured the globe to find out who had absconded with this treasure. I was surprised to find that they had been purchased by a cigar aficionado, Gary Liotta, owner of Santiago Cigar Factory, not too far from where I lived, in Rochester, NY. I was even more surprised by the reason that Mr. Liotta was willing to pay such an exorbitant amount for them. The reason why was even more astounding than the original discovery of these cigars.


Incredibly, the master roller for Santiago Cigar Factory, Mr. Amadeo Bonilla, claims that he is directly descended from the makers of these ancient cigars! This was confirmed by a family seal found pressed into the clay humidor containing these cigars - an emblem that Mr. Bonilla's family continues to use to this day.


Despite my negotiations with Mr. Liotta, he was not willing to sell one to me because he considered them to be "priceless". Nevertheless, my persistence paid off when I was invited to celebrate Mr. Bonilla's 29th Birthday, and was one of the lucky few who were gifted one of these precious cigars to do with as I pleased. I chose to smoke it. This is my review.




Cigar: 601 year old hand rolled pre-Columbian 26 X 4" piramide from cave in present-day Guatemalia


Cut: Pre-cut and ready to light


Beverage: Water - one shot at this, I did not want to obscure the flavor in any way

The Band: Any band, had one been originally added, had long since deteriorated.
Pre-lighting impressions: The draw was a bit tight, and I was worried that it might not smoke well at first. The wrapper (appeared to be a medium-aged maduro) was anything but seamless, although there did not appear to be large veins. The artistry of cigar making for aesthetics at the time this cigar was made was not evident in what it has developed into today.
I am told that these cigars were rolled on the thighs of virgins...


Light: Being a small ring gauge, and having rested for nearly an additional year in the state-of-the-art humidor at Santiago Cigar Factory (I think it helped), The cigar lit immediately.




First 3rd: The ash was a bit flakey, but the burn was even. The volume of smoke was average, and surprisingly aromatic. I was able to keep the ash for about 1.5" before it fell off on its own. The flavor was unique and difficult to describe (musky-musty?), which was not surprising given that this tobacco pre-dates any known varietal grown today and it had spent 600 years in a cave. I will say that this already was a VERY strong cigar, because my head was already swimming by the end of the first third.


Second 3rd: The ash even out and turned to a nice white color. This is where the cigar really began to open up to what I believe was the "true" flavor. Again, it was difficult to describe, but I swear I could taste the coconut buttered thighs of the virgin this cigar was rolled upon...




Last 3rd: Incredibly, this 601 year old cigar was burning straight and even. The volume of smoke remained about average. The powerful nicotine was beginning to hide the flavor a bit, which had morphed into what can be described as smoking a Jalapeño! Wow! Talk about pepper! I had expected this cigar to be mellow after aging for so long. I finally had to put it down because it was too overpowering.


Final thoughts: This was a good smoke. I have nothing else to compare it to. I feel incredibly privileged to have had the opportunity to smoke this bit of history. Some might think it a travesty to burn away such an heirloom. Somehow, I think that Mr. Bonilla's great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparent would not have had it any other way. I for one am happy to be able to tell this story on today, of all days. Have a good one folks!
HombreDeBarco is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 22 Old 04-01-2013, 01:58 PM
Leading Puffer Fish
 
HTML5 Gordon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,035
         
Re: Review of a 601 year old pre-Columbian cigar

WOW! Absolutely awesome review! There's not too many opportunities in life to have a unique experience like that. I definitely would have smoked it too!










































Here's hoping this isn't an April Fool's joke.
HTML5 Gordon is offline  
post #3 of 22 Old 04-01-2013, 02:15 PM
Elder Puffer Fish Leader
 
fuente~fuente's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 4,588
           
Re: Review of a 601 year old pre-Columbian cigar

We have some jokers here at PUFF :tongue1:

Twitter @ OB1theStogie
Coming at you from the Dirty Dirty...
fuente~fuente is offline  
 
post #4 of 22 Old 04-01-2013, 02:16 PM
Puffer Fish with many spikes
 
A.McSmoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 823
       
Re: Review of a 601 year old pre-Columbian cigar

This story is very interesting. Just to think of all the history, natural & unnatural, geological & aerological changes of the Earth, while those cigars were resting in a cave unscathed. That's Amazing!

Thanks, and I most definitely would've smoked it also.
A.McSmoke is offline  
post #5 of 22 Old 04-01-2013, 02:23 PM
Puffer Fish with many spikes
 
jeepman_su's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Monroeville
Posts: 849
      
Re: Review of a 601 year old pre-Columbian cigar

Ok I am torn between incredible experience and elaborate April Fool's Day post.......

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"If I cannot smoke in heaven, then I shall not go." -- Mark Twain
jeepman_su is offline  
post #6 of 22 Old 04-01-2013, 02:27 PM
No longer a community member.
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2,070
           
Re: Review of a 601 year old pre-Columbian cigar

I thought 601 was a newish Brand?
Shemp75 is offline  
post #7 of 22 Old 04-01-2013, 02:32 PM
TJB
Evolving Lead Puffer Fish
 
TJB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 580
      
Re: Review of a 601 year old pre-Columbian cigar

Lots of jokers here!
TJB is offline  
post #8 of 22 Old 04-01-2013, 02:37 PM
Resident Fat Boy
 
jabuan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Honozooloo
Posts: 712
           
Re: Review of a 601 year old pre-Columbian cigar

Quote:
Originally Posted by fuente~fuente View Post
We have some jokers here at PUFF :tongue1:
indeed! hahahaahahah. he left out burn time though.

Let no man pull you low enough to hate him. ~ Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
jabuan is offline  
post #9 of 22 Old 04-01-2013, 02:44 PM
Evolving Lead Puffer Fish
 
ten08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Valdosta
Posts: 724
          
Re: Review of a 601 year old pre-Columbian cigar

Hand rolled in the backwoods of Guatemala! owboyic9:
ten08 is offline  
post #10 of 22 Old 04-01-2013, 03:02 PM
Leading Puffer Fish
 
HTML5 Gordon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,035
         
Re: Review of a 601 year old pre-Columbian cigar

Quote:
Originally Posted by ten08 View Post
Hand rolled in the backwoods of Guatemala! owboyic9:
:smoke:
HTML5 Gordon is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Puff Cigar Discussion Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome